Clinical trial NCT05778435 - References

Pregnancy Related — The Effect of Wireless Fetal Monitoring System on Comfort, Pain and Satisfaction

Citation(s)

•   Akbas P, Ozkan Sat S, Is M, Yaman S
  Turkish Validity-Reliability Study Of The Scale Of For Coping With Labor Pain. Journal of Health Sciences of Kocaeli University. 2021;7(3):235-241.
•   Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GM
  Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD006066. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006066.
•   Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Medley N
  Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 15;2015(4):CD001450. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001450.pub4.
•   Boatin AA, Wylie B, Goldfarb I, Azevedo R, Pittel E, Ng C, Haberer J
  Wireless fetal heart rate monitoring in inpatient full-term pregnant women: testing functionality and acceptability. PLoS One. 2015 Jan 26;10(1):e0117043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117
•   Coskuner Potur D, Dogan Merih Y
  The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Childbirth Comfort Questionnaire. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences. 2015;18(4):252-258.
•   Delice K
  Before Birth Of Pregnant, Memoir, Postpartum Evaluation Of Knowledge Level Of Satisfaction From Services (Elbistan Sample). Master's thesis, Beykent University, Social Sciences Institute, Department Of Business, Hospital And Health Institutions Management Department, Istanbul. 2019. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=1gk8TzmGFaXVQPYkrUU_4Q&no=Enb8wsxJlkjAQuCt4e2yfQ
•   Essa MR, Hafez SK
  Effect of different positions of pregnant women on their comfort and fetal cardiotocographic patterns during nonstress test. International Journal For Research in Health Sciences And Nursing. 2018;4(2):1-24.
•   Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A
  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
•   Goncu Serhatlioglu S, Karahan N, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR
  Construct and content validity of the Turkish Birth Satisfaction Scale - Revised (T-BSS-R). J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2018 Jul;36(3):235-245. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2018.1443322. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
•   Harkey KT, Casale MB, Pantelopoulos AA, Zurcher MA
  Assessing the clinical use of a novel, mobile fetal monitoring device. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2014;123:55S.
•   Huskisson EC
  Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974 Nov 9;2(7889):1127-31. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)90884-8. No abstract available.
•   Kent RA, Yazbek M, Heyns T, Coetzee I
  The support needs of high-risk antenatal patients in prolonged hospitalisation. Midwifery. 2015 Jan;31(1):164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
•   Knupp RJ, Andrews WW, Tita ATN
  The future of electronic fetal monitoring. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Aug;67:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
•   Lawrence A, Lewis L, Hofmeyr GJ, Styles C
  Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 9;(10):CD003934. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003934.pub4.
•   Martin CH, Fleming V
  The birth satisfaction scale. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2011;24(2):124-35. doi: 10.1108/09526861111105086.
•   Menihan CA, Kopel E
  Electronic Fetal Monitoring: Concepts and Applications. 2nd Ed. Chapter 2. Philadelphia, Lippincott: Williams&Wilkins; 2008.
•   Mhajna M, Schwartz N, Levit-Rosen L, Warsof S, Lipschuetz M, Jakobs M, Rychik J, Sohn C, Yagel S
  Wireless, remote solution for home fetal and maternal heart rate monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 May;2(2):100101. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100101. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
•   Monson M, Heuser C, Einerson BD, Esplin I, Snow G, Varner M, Esplin MS
  Evaluation of an external fetal electrocardiogram monitoring system: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):244.e1-244.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.012. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
•   Mugyenyi GR, Atukunda EC, Ngonzi J, Boatin A, Wylie BJ, Haberer JE
  Functionality and acceptability of a wireless fetal heart rate monitoring device in term pregnant women in rural Southwestern Uganda. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jun 8;17(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1361-1.
•   Nguyen K, Bamgbose E, Cox BP, Huang SP, Mierzwa A, Hutchins S, Caso B, Culjat M, Connelly C, Lacoursiere DY, Singh RS
  Wearable Fetal Monitoring Solution for Improved Mobility During Labor & Delivery. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018 Jul;2018:4397-4400. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513321.
•   Pehlivan N, Demirel Bozkurt O
  Vertical position in the second stage of labor: Vertical birth chair. Acta Medica Nicomedia. 2020;3(1):42-48.
•   Roham M, Saldivar E, Raghavan S, Zurcher M, Mack J, Mehregany M
  A mobile wearable wireless fetal heart monitoring system. In 2011 5th International Symposium on Medical Information and Communication Technology (pp. 135-138). IEEE. (2011, March).
•   Rubarth LB, Schoening AM, Cosimano A, Sandhurst H
  Women's experience of hospitalized bed rest during high-risk pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2012 May-Jun;41(3):398-407. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01349.x. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
•   Ryu D, Kim DH, Price JT, Lee JY, Chung HU, Allen E, Walter JR, Jeong H, Cao J, Kulikova E, Abu-Zayed H, Lee R, Martell KL, Zhang M, Kampmeier BR, Hill M, Lee J, Kim E, Park Y, Jang H, Arafa H, Liu C, Chisembele M, Vwalika B, Sindano N, Spelke MB, Paller AS, Premkumar A, Grobman WA, Stringer JSA, Rogers JA, Xu S
  Comprehensive pregnancy monitoring with a network of wireless, soft, and flexible sensors in high- and low-resource health settings. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 May 18;118(20):e2100466118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2100466118.
•   Schramm K, Lapert F, Nees J, Lempersz C, Oei SG, Haun MW, Maatouk I, Bruckner T, Sohn C, Schott S
  Acceptance of a new non-invasive fetal monitoring system and attitude for telemedicine approaches in obstetrics: a case-control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Dec;298(6):1085-1093. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4918-y. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
•   van den Heuvel JFM, Ganzevoort W, De Haan-Jebbink JM, van der Ham DP, Deurloo KL, Seeber L, Franx A, Bekker MN
  HOspital care versus TELemonitoring in high-risk pregnancy (HOTEL): study protocol for a multicentre non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 28;9(10):e031700. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031700.
•   van den Heuvel JFM, Teunis CJ, Franx A, Crombag NMTH, Bekker MN
  Home-based telemonitoring versus hospital admission in high risk pregnancies: a qualitative study on women's experiences. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Feb 4;20(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2779-4.
•   Watson K, Mills TA, Lavender T
  Experiences and outcomes on the use of telemetry to monitor the fetal heart during labour: findings from a mixed methods study. Women Birth. 2022 May;35(3):e243-e252. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.06.004. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
•   WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience
  Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513809/

The Effect Of The Wireless Fetal Monitoring Used During Birth On The Women's Comfort, Labour Pain And Birth Satisfaction

Details for clinical trial NCT05778435