Clinical trial NCT05606874 - References

Pit and Fissure Sealant — Retention Rate and Caries Preventive Effect of Preheated Flowable Resin Composite Used as a Pit and Fissure Sealant

Citation(s)

•   Aguilar FG, Drubi-Filho B, Casemiro LA, Watanabe MG, Pires-de-Souza FC
  Retention and penetration of a conventional resin-based sealant and a photochromatic flowable composite resin placed on occlusal pits and fissures. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2007 Oct-Dec;25(4):169-73. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.37012.
•   Aman N, Khan FR, Salim A, Farid H
  A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive. J Conserv Dent. 2015 Jan-Feb;18(1):20-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.148883.
•   Bagherian A, Shirazi AS
  Flowable composite as fissure sealing material? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br Dent J. 2018 Jan 26;224(2):92-97. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.40. Erratum In: Br Dent J. 2018 Feb 23;224(4):254.
•   Beun S, Bailly C, Devaux J, Leloup G
  Physical, mechanical and rheological characterization of resin-based pit and fissure sealants compared to flowable resin composites. Dent Mater. 2012 Apr;28(4):349-59. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.11.001. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
•   Dukic W, Dukic OL, Milardovic S, Vindakijevic Z
  Clinical comparison of flowable composite to other fissure sealing materials--a 12 months study. Coll Antropol. 2007 Dec;31(4):1019-24.
•   Erbas Unverdi G, Atac SA, Cehreli ZC
  Effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants bonded with different adhesive systems: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Sep;21(7):2235-2243. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-2016-8. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
•   Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Yaman BC, Ozel S, Yucel T, Yildiz E
  Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study. J Dent. 2014 Feb;42(2):149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.015. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
•   Featherstone JD
  Dental caries: a dynamic disease process. Aust Dent J. 2008 Sep;53(3):286-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00064.x.
•   Ganesh M, Shobha T
  Comparative evaluation of the marginal sealing ability of Fuji VII and Concise as pit and fissure sealants. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007 May 1;8(4):10-8.
•   Garg N, Indushekar KR, Saraf BG, Sheoran N, Sardana D
  Comparative Evaluation of Penetration Ability of Three Pit and Fissure Sealants and Their Relationship with Fissure Patterns. J Dent (Shiraz). 2018 Jun;19(2):92-99.
•   Irinoda Y, Matsumura Y, Kito H, Nakano T, Toyama T, Nakagaki H, Tsuchiya T
  Effect of sealant viscosity on the penetration of resin into etched human enamel. Oper Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;25(4):274-82.
•   Jafarzadeh M, Malekafzali B, Tadayon N, Fallahi S
  Retention of a Flowable Composite Resin in Comparison to a Conventional Resin-Based Sealant: One-year Follow-up. J Dent (Tehran). 2010 Winter;7(1):1-5. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
•   Khare M, Suprabha BS, Shenoy R, Rao A
  Evaluation of pit-and-fissure sealants placed with four different bonding protocols: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017 Nov;27(6):444-453. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12281. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
•   Kim HJ, Choi HJ, Kim KY, Kim KM
  Effect of Heat and Sonic Vibration on Penetration of a Flowable Resin Composite Used as a Pit and Fissure Sealant. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020;44(1):41-46. doi: 10.17796/1053-4625-44.1.7.
•   Lopes LCP, Terada RSS, Tsuzuki FM, Giannini M, Hirata R
  Heating and preheating of dental restorative materials-a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Dec;24(12):4225-4235. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03637-2. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
•   Nahvi A, Razavian A, Abedi H, Charati JY
  A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems. Eur J Dent. 2018 Apr-Jun;12(2):242-246. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_63_18.
•   Oba AA, Sonmez IS, Ercan E, Dulgergil T
  Comparison of retention rates of fissure sealants using two flowable restorative materials and a conventional resin sealant: two-year follow-up. Med Princ Pract. 2012;21(3):234-7. doi: 10.1159/000333561. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
•   Ramesh H, Ashok R, Rajan M, Balaji L, Ganesh A
  Retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: A systematic review. Heliyon. 2020 Sep 24;6(9):e04964. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04964. eCollection 2020 Sep.
•   Rickman LJ, Padipatvuthikul P, Chee B
  Clinical applications of preheated hybrid resin composite. Br Dent J. 2011 Jul 22;211(2):63-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.571.
•   Rishika, Garg N, Mayall SS, Pathivada L, Yeluri R
  Combined Effect of Enamel Deproteinization and Intermediate Bonding in the Retention of Pit and Fissure Sealants in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;42(6):427-433. doi: 10.17796/1053-4625-42.6.4. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
•   Subramaniam P, Konde S, Mandanna DK
  Retention of a resin-based sealant and a glass ionomer used as a fissure sealant: a comparative clinical study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2008 Sep;26(3):114-20. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.43192.

Retention Rate and Caries Preventive Effect of Preheated Flowable Resin Composite Used as a Pit and Fissure Sealant Versus Conventional Resin-based Fissure Sealant in Patients With Permanent Molars With Deep Pit and Fissure Over One Year Follow up. A Randomized Clinical Trial

Details for clinical trial NCT05606874