Clinical trial NCT03259750 - References

Ankle; Injury, Superficial, Multiple (With Foot) — The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) is Translated From English to Turkish and Assess the Validity and Reliability in Athletic Population Who Have Foot and Ankle Disorders.

Citation(s)

•   Arnold BL, Wright CJ, Ross SE
  Functional ankle instability and health-related quality of life. J Athl Train. 2011 Nov-Dec;46(6):634-41.
•   Arunakul M, Arunakul P, Suesiritumrong C, Angthong C, Chernchujit B
  Validity and Reliability of Thai Version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Subjective Form. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Jun;98(6):561-7.
•   Borloz S, Crevoisier X, Deriaz O, Ballabeni P, Martin RL, Luthi F
  Evidence for validity and reliability of a French version of the FAAM. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Feb 8;12:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-40.
•   Carcia CR, Martin RL, Drouin JM
  Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure in athletes with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2008 Apr-Jun;43(2):179-83. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.179.
•   Donahue M, Simon J, Docherty CL
  Critical review of self-reported functional ankle instability measures. Foot Ankle Int. 2011 Dec;32(12):1140-6. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2011.1140.
•   González-Sánchez M, Li GZ, Ruiz Muñoz M, Cuesta-Vargas AI
  Foot and ankle ability measure to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders: a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Oct;39(21):2182-2189. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1219772. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
•   Hoch JM, Druvenga B, Ferguson BA, Houston MN, Hoch MC
  Patient-Reported Outcomes in Male and Female Collegiate Soccer Players During an Athletic Season. J Athl Train. 2015 Sep;50(9):930-6. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-50.5.03. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
•   Hoch JM, Legner JL, Lorete C, Hoch MC
  The Validity of the Quick-FAAM in Patients Seeking Treatment for an Acute or Sub Acute Foot or Ankle Health Condition. J Sport Rehabil. 2016 Sep 16:1-13. [Epub ahead of print]
•   Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, Conti SF, Van Swearingen JM
  Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Nov;26(11):968-83.
•   Martin RL, Irrgang JJ
  A survey of self-reported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Feb;37(2):72-84. Review.
•   Moreira TS, Magalhães Lde C, Silva RD, Martin RL, Resende MA
  Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Brazilian version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Dec;38(25):2479-90. doi: 10.3109/09638288
•   Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Bravini E, Bargeri S, Moroso M, Plebani G, Ferriero G
  [Foot and ankle ability measure: cross-cultural translation and validation of the Italian version of the ADL module (FAAM-I/ADL)]. Med Lav. 2014 Jul 15;105(5):357-65. Italian.
•   Uematsu D, Suzuki H, Sasaki S, Nagano Y, Shinozuka N, Sunagawa N, Fukubayashi T
  Evidence of validity for the Japanese version of the foot and ankle ability measure. J Athl Train. 2015 Jan;50(1):65-70. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.42. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
•   Weel H, Zwiers R, Azim D, Sierevelt IN, Haverkamp D, van Dijk CN, Kerkhoffs GM
  Validity and reliability of a Dutch version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Apr;24(4):1348-54. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3480-9.

Validity and Reliability of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Turkish Version for Athletes

Details for clinical trial NCT03259750