Clinical trial NCT02382991 - References

Amputation of Hip and Thigh, Level Unspecified — Assessment of Disability Compensation With the C-LEG COMPACT 2 Knee (Ref. 3C60 et 3C60=ST)

Citation(s)

•   Burnfield JM, Eberly VJ, Gronely JK, Perry J, Yule WJ, Mulroy SJ
  Impact of stance phase microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis on ramp negotiation and community walking function in K2 level transfemoral amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2012 Mar;36(1):95-104. doi: 10.1177/0309364611431611. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
•   Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B
  Development of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST). Assist Technol. 1996;8(1):3-13.
•   Dite W, Connor HJ, Curtis HC
  Clinical identification of multiple fall risk early after unilateral transtibial amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jan;88(1):109-14.
•   Franchignoni F, Orlandini D, Ferriero G, Moscato TA
  Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the locomotor capabilities index in adults with lower-limb amputation undergoing prosthetic training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 May;85(5):743-8.
•   Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grisé MC, Potvin D
  Enabling factors related to prosthetic use by people with transtibial and transfemoral amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Jun;80(6):706-13.
•   Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grisé MC
  Prosthetic profile of the amputee questionnaire: validity and reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Dec;75(12):1309-14.
•   Gauthier-Gagnon, C, grisé, MCL, Lepage Y
  The Locomotor Capabilities Index : Content validity. J rehabil OutcomesMeas 2(4) : 40-46, 1998.
•   Gauthier-Gagnon, C, Grisé, MCL, Potvin, L
  Predisposing factors related to prosthetic use by people with a transtibial and transfemoral amputation. J Prosthet Orthot 10: 99-109, 1998
•   Grisé MC, Gauthier-Gagnon C, Martineau GG
  Prosthetic profile of people with lower extremity amputation: conception and design of a follow-up questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Aug;74(8):862-70.
•   Leplège A, Mesbah M, Marquis P
  [Preliminary analysis of the psychometric properties of the French version of an international questionnaire measuring the quality of life: the MOS SF-36 (version 1.1)]. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1995;43(4):371-9. French.
•   Leplège, A
  (2001). Introduction, enjeux, définitions. In J. Coste et A. Leplège (Eds.), Mesure de la santé perceptuelle et de la qualité de vie : méthodes et applications (pp 15-36). Paris : Editions Estem
•   Loiret I, Paysant J, Martinet N, André JM
  [Evaluation of amputees]. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2005 Jul;48(6):307-16. Epub 2005 Apr 15. Review. French.
•   Schoppen T, Boonstra A, Groothoff JW, de Vries J, Göeken LN, Eisma WH
  The Timed "up and go" test: reliability and validity in persons with unilateral lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Jul;80(7):825-8.
•   Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD
  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.
•   Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B (1993)
  Health survey : manual and interpretation guide. Boston, Massachussets : The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993

Randomized, Cross-over Study Comparing the Efficacy of the 3C60 Knee Against Non-microprocessor Controlled Knees on the Risk of Falling and Locomotor Skills of Moderately Active Persons With Leg Amputation Above Knee or Knee Disarticulation

Details for clinical trial NCT02382991