Clinical trial NCT00156741 - References

Bradycardia; Sick Sinus Syndrome, AV Block — Efficacy of a Pacemaker Algorithm in Promotion of the Intrinsic Heart Activity.

Citation(s)

•   Andersen HR, Kristensen L, Nielsen JC, Mortensen PT, Pedersen OL, Pedersen AK, Atrial verses dual chamber pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure and mortality during follow-up in a randomised trial of 177 patients
  PACE 2001; 24: 575 Abstract 174
•   Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE, Thuesen L, Mortensen PT, Vesterlund T, Pedersen AK
  Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet. 1997 Oct 25;350(9086):1210-6.
•   Andersen HR, Thuesen L, Bagger JP, Vesterlund T, Thomsen PE
  Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet. 1994 Dec 3;344(8936):1523-8.
•   Barold SS
  Indications for permanent cardiac pacing in first-degree AV block: class I, II, or III? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 May;19(5):747-51.
•   Bode F, Wiegand U, Katus HA, Potratz J
  Inhibition of ventricular stimulation in patients with dual chamber pacemakers and prolonged AV conduction. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999 Oct;22(10):1425-31.
•   Boute W, Brunekreeft W
  AV delay hysteresis in dual chamber pacing: initial results from the Ruby Clinical Investigation. Vitatext 1994; 1: 13-14
•   Brandt J, Anderson H, Fåhraeus T, Schüller H
  Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Sep;20(3):633-9.
•   Carisma MB, Manalo JM, Chua WT
  Atrioventricular conduction in sick sinus syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1988 Nov;11(11 Pt 2):1636-40.
•   Charles RG, McComb JM
  Systematic trial of pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation (STOP-AF). Heart. 1997 Sep;78(3):224-5.
•   Clarke KW, Connelly DT, Charles RG
  Single chamber atrial pacing: an underused and cost-effective pacing modality in sinus node disease. Heart. 1998 Oct;80(4):387-9.
•   Cohen SI, Frank HA
  Preservation of active atrial transport; an important clinical consideration in cardiac pacing. Chest. 1982 Jan;81(1):51-4.
•   Connolly SJ, Kerr CR, Gent M, Roberts RS, Yusuf S, Gillis AM, Sami MH, Talajic M, Tang AS, Klein GJ, Lau C, Newman DM
  Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 11;342(19):1385-91.
•   Connolly SJ, Talajic M, Roy D, Tang ASL, Lav C, Bonilla L, Gillis AM
  The effect of pacemaker selection on functional capacity in the Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing (CTOPP). Circulation 1999; 100(suppl I): I-465
•   Danish pacemaker and ICD register
  1999. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Oct;23(10 Pt 2):S1-93.
•   Elshot SR, el Gamal MI, Tielen KH, van Gelder BM
  Incidence of atrioventricular block and chronic atrial flutter/fibrillation after implantation of atrial pacemakers; follow-up of more than ten years. Int J Cardiol. 1993 Mar;38(3):303-8.
•   Gillis AM, Goldman BS, Yee R, Irwin ME, Wilson SL, Ashton T, Philippon F, Fraser JD, Clavette P, Tyers GF
  Cardiac pacing in Canada in 1998: working towards optimal pacing therapy. Canadian Working Group on Cardiac Pacing. Can J Cardiol. 1998 Sep;14(9):1115-20.
•   Grimm W, Langenfeld H, Maisch B, Kochsiek K
  Symptoms, cardiovascular risk profile and spontaneous ECG in paced patients: a five-year follow-up study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990 Dec;13(12 Pt 2):2086-90.
•   Harper GR, Pina IL, Kutalek SP
  Intrinsic conduction maximizes cardiopulmonary performance in patients with dual chamber pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Nov;14(11 Pt 2):1787-91.
•   Haywood GA, Ward J, Ward DE, Camm AJ
  Atrioventricular Wenckebach point and progression to atrioventricular block in sinoatrial disease. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990 Dec;13(12 Pt 2):2054-8.
•   Hesselson AB, Parsonnet V, Bernstein AD, Bonavita GJ
  Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Jun;19(7):1542-9. Review.
•   Jutzy RV, Feenstra L, Pai R, Florio J, Bansal R, Aybar R, Levine PA
  Comparison of intrinsic versus paced ventricular function. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992 Nov;15(11 Pt 2):1919-22.
•   Kallryd A, Kruse I, Rydén L
  Atrial inhibited pacing in the sick sinus node syndrome: clinical value and the demand for rate responsiveness. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1989 Jun;12(6):954-61.
•   Kerr CR, Tyers GF, Vorderbrugge S
  Atrial pacing: efficacy and safety. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1989 Jul;12(7 Pt 1):1049-54.
•   Kristensen L, Nielsen JC, Andersen HR
  Outcome of patients with sick sinus syndrome treated by different pacing modalities. In Ovsyshcher IE (ed): Cardiac arrhythmias and device therapy results and perspectives for the new century. Futura Publishing Company Inc., Armonk NY, 2000, 323-332.
•   Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO, Silverman R, Leon A, Yee R, Marinchak RA, Flaker G, Schron E, Orav EJ, Hellkamp AS, Greer S, McAnulty J, Ellenbogen K, Ehlert F, Freedman RA, Estes NA 3rd, Greenspon A, Goldman L; Mode Selection Trial in Sinus-Node Dysfunction
  Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 13;346(24):1854-62.
•   Lamas GA, Orav EJ, Stambler BS, Ellenbogen KA, Sgarbossa EB, Huang SK, Marinchak RA, Estes NA 3rd, Mitchell GF, Lieberman EH, Mangione CM, Goldman L
  Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing. Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1998 Apr 16;338(16):1097-104.
•   Leclercq C, Gras D, Le Helloco A, Nicol L, Mabo P, Daubert C
  Hemodynamic importance of preserving the normal sequence of ventricular activation in permanent cardiac pacing. Am Heart J. 1995 Jun;129(6):1133-41.
•   Mattioli AV, Vivoli D, Mattioli G
  Influence of pacing modalities on the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients without prior atrial fibrillation. A prospective study. Eur Heart J. 1998 Feb;19(2):282-6.
•   Montanez A, Hennekens CH, Zebede J, Lamas GA
  Pacemaker mode selection: the evidence from randomized trials. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 May;26(5):1270-82. Review.
•   Narula OS
  Atrioventricular conduction defects in patients with sinus bradycardia. Analysis by His bundle recordings. Circulation. 1971 Dec;44(6):1096-110.
•   Nielsen JC, Kristensen L, Andersen HR, Mortensen PT, Pedersen OL, Pedersen AK
  A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Aug 20;42(4):614-23.
•   Nielsen JC, Kristensen L, Pedersen AK, Mortensen PT, Pedersen OL
  Changes in left atrial size and left ventricular size and functioning during follow-up of 177 patients with sick sinus syndrome randomised to atrial or dual chamber pacing. PACE 2001; 24: 697 Abstract 633
•   Nielsen JC, Pedersen AK, Mortensen PT, Andersen HR
  Programming a fixed long atrioventricular delay is not effective in preventing ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Europace. 1999 Apr;1(2):113-20.
•   Prech M, Grygier M, Mitkowski P, Stanek K, Skorupski W, Moszyñska B, Zerbe F, Cieslinski A
  Effect of restoration of AV synchrony on stroke volume, exercise capacity, and quality-of-life: can we predict the beneficial effect of a pacemaker upgrade? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001 Mar;24(3):302-7.
•   Rosenqvist M, Bergfeldt L, Haga Y, Rydén J, Rydén L, Owall A
  The effect of ventricular activation sequence on cardiac performance during pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 Sep;19(9):1279-86.
•   Rosenqvist M, Brandt J, Schüller H
  Long-term pacing in sinus node disease: effects of stimulation mode on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Am Heart J. 1988 Jul;116(1 Pt 1):16-22.
•   Santini M, Alexidou G, Ansalone G, Cacciatore G, Cini R, Turitto G
  Relation of prognosis in sick sinus syndrome to age, conduction defects and modes of permanent cardiac pacing. Am J Cardiol. 1990 Mar 15;65(11):729-35.
•   Skanes AC, Krahn AD, Yee R, Klein GJ, Connolly SJ, Kerr CR, Gent M, Thorpe KE, Roberts RS; Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing
  Progression to chronic atrial fibrillation after pacing: the Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing. CTOPP Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Jul;38(1):167-72.
•   Stangl K, Seitz K, Wirtzfeld A, Alt E, Blömer H
  Differences between atrial single chamber pacing (AAI) and ventricular single chamber pacing (VVI) with respect to prognosis and antiarrhythmic effect in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990 Dec;13(12 Pt 2):2080-5.
•   Stierle U, Krüger D, Vincent AM, Mitusch R, Giannitsis E, Wiegand U, Potratz J
  An optimized AV delay algorithm for patients with intermittent atrioventricular conduction. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 May;21(5):1035-43.
•   Sulke N, Chambers J, Dritsas A, Sowton E
  A randomized double-blind crossover comparison of four rate-responsive pacing modes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Mar 1;17(3):696-706.
•   Sutton R, Kenny RA
  The natural history of sick sinus syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1986 Nov;9(6 Pt 2):1110-4. Review.
•   The MOST Trial Investigators
  Baseline QRS duration = 120 milliseconds and cumulative percent time ventricular paced predicts increased risk of heart failure, stroke and death in DDDR-paced patients with sick sinus syndrome in MOST. PACE 2002; 690 Abstract 672
•   The MOST Trial Investigators
  Effect of pacing mode and cumulative percent time ventricular paced on heart failure in patients with sick sinus syndrome and baseline QRS duration < 120 milliseconds in MOST. PACE 2002; 561 Abstract 155.
•   Toff WD, Skehan JD, De Bono DP, Camm AJ
  The United Kingdom pacing and cardiovascular events (UKPACE) trial. United Kingdom Pacing and Cardiovascular Events. Heart. 1997 Sep;78(3):221-3.
•   Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals
  International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. N Engl J Med. 1991 Feb 7;324(6):424-8.
•   Vardas PE, Simantirakis EN, Parthenakis FI, Chrysostomakis SI, Skalidis EI, Zuridakis EG
  AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Jul;20(7):1762-8.
•   Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE, Greene HL, Hallstrom AP, Hsia H, Kutalek SP, Sharma A; Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator Trial Investigators
  Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial. JAMA. 2002 Dec 25;288(24):3115-23.
•   Woodend K, Tang SI, Irvine J, Connolly S, Lav C, Paquette M, Newman D
  Pacemaker dependency conditions the QOL benefits of physiologic over VVI pacing: Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing (CTOPP). Circulation 1999; 100(suppl I): I-20

IntAct, Study on Promotion of Intrinsic Activity.

Details for clinical trial NCT00156741