Clinical trial NCT02102334 - References

Osteoarthritis of the Hip — Validity, Reliability and Reproducibility of Plain Radiographic Measurements After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Citation(s)

•   Bonett DG
  Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med. 2002 May 15;21(9):1331-5.
•   Gililland JM, Anderson LA, Boffeli SL, Pelt CE, Peters CL, Kubiak EN
  A fluoroscopic grid in supine total hip arthroplasty: improving cup position, limb length, and hip offset. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Sep;27(8 Suppl):111-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.027. Epub 2012 May 3.
•   Kjellberg M, Al-Amiry B, Englund E, Sjödén GO, Sayed-Noor AS
  Measurement of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. The reliability of a plain radiographic method compared to CT-scanogram. Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Feb;41(2):187-91. doi: 10.1007/s00256-011-1166-7. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
•   Kjellberg M, Englund E, Sayed-Noor AS
  A new radiographic method of measuring femoral offset. The Sundsvall method. Hip Int. 2009 Oct-Dec;19(4):377-81.
•   Konyves A, Bannister GC
  The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Feb;87(2):155-7.
•   Lecerf G, Fessy MH, Philippot R, Massin P, Giraud F, Flecher X, Girard J, Mertl P, Marchetti E, Stindel E
  Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 May;95(3):210-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.03.010. Epub 2009 May 6. Review.
•   Little NJ, Busch CA, Gallagher JA, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB
  Acetabular polyethylene wear and acetabular inclination and femoral offset. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Nov;467(11):2895-900. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0845-3. Epub 2009 May 2.
•   Moskal JT, Capps SG
  Acetabular component positioning in total hip arthroplasty: an evidence-based analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Dec;26(8):1432-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.11.011. Epub 2011 Feb 5. Review.
•   Patel SR, Toms AP, Rehman JM, Wimhurst J
  A reliability study of measurement tools available on standard picture archiving and communication system workstations for the evaluation of hip radiographs following arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Sep 21;93(18):1712-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00709.
•   Woolson ST, Hartford JM, Sawyer A
  Results of a method of leg-length equalization for patients undergoing primary total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty. 1999 Feb;14(2):159-64.
•   Wylde V, Maclean A, Blom AW
  Post-operative radiographic factors and patient-reported outcome after total hip replacement. Hip Int. 2012 Mar-Apr;22(2):153-9. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2012.9225.
•   Wylde V, Whitehouse SL, Taylor AH, Pattison GT, Bannister GC, Blom AW
  Prevalence and functional impact of patient-perceived leg length discrepancy after hip replacement. Int Orthop. 2009 Aug;33(4):905-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0563-6. Epub 2008 Apr 25.

Validity, Reliability and Reproducibility of Plain Radiographic Measurements After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Details for clinical trial NCT02102334