Clinical Trials Logo

Citation(s)

  •   Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD
    Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):57-63. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9.
  •   Fitz W
    Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with use of novel patient-specific resurfacing implants and personalized jigs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Feb;91 Suppl 1:69-76. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01448.
  •   Fitzpatrick C, FitzPatrick D, Lee J, Auger D
    Statistical design of unicompartmental tibial implants and comparison with current devices. Knee. 2007 Mar;14(2):138-44. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2006.11.005. Epub 2006 Dec 22.
  •   Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M
    Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
  •   Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB
    The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Nov;452:35-43. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000238825.63648.1e.
  •   Rougraff BT, Heck DA, Gibson AE
    A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Dec;(273):157-64.

Analysis of Procedure-related Costs and Proposed Benefits of the ConforMIS iTotal® Cruciate Retaining Knee Replacement System Versus Standard Total Knee

Details for clinical trial NCT01899417