Clinical trial NCT03550716 - References

Non-obstructive Azoospermia — Surgical Sperm Retrieval in Non-obstructive Azoospermic Men: mTESE vs. TESA

Citation(s)

•   Amer M, Ateyah A, Hany R, Zohdy W
  Prospective comparative study between microsurgical and conventional testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia: follow-up by serial ultrasound examinations. Hum Reprod. 2000 Mar;15(3):653-6.
•   Argyle CE, Harper JC, Davies MC
  Oocyte cryopreservation: where are we now? Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Jun;22(4):440-9. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw007. Epub 2016 Mar 22. Review.
•   Bernie AM, Mata DA, Ramasamy R, Schlegel PN
  Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2015 Nov;104(5):1099-103.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1136. Epub 2015 Aug 8. Review.
•   Dabaja AA, Schlegel PN
  Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: an update. Asian J Androl. 2013 Jan;15(1):35-9. doi: 10.1038/aja.2012.141. Epub 2012 Dec 17. Review.
•   Deruyver Y, Vanderschueren D, Van der Aa F
  Outcome of microdissection TESE compared with conventional TESE in non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review. Andrology. 2014 Jan;2(1):20-4. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2013.00148.x. Epub 2013 Nov 6. Review.
•   Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA
  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13.
•   Donoso P, Tournaye H, Devroey P
  Which is the best sperm retrieval technique for non-obstructive azoospermia? A systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2007 Nov-Dec;13(6):539-49. Epub 2007 Sep 24. Review.
•   Jarow JP, Espeland MA, Lipshultz LI
  Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. J Urol. 1989 Jul;142(1):62-5.
•   Jensen CF, Ohl DA, Hiner MR, Fode M, Shah T, Smith GD, Sonksen J
  Multiple needle-pass percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration as first-line treatment in azoospermic men. Andrology. 2016 Mar;4(2):257-62. doi: 10.1111/andr.12143. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
•   Okada H, Dobashi M, Yamazaki T, Hara I, Fujisawa M, Arakawa S, Kamidono S
  Conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol. 2002 Sep;168(3):1063-7.
•   Ramasamy R, Yagan N, Schlegel PN
  Structural and functional changes to the testis after conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Urology. 2005 Jun;65(6):1190-4.
•   Schlegel PN
  Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Reprod. 1999 Jan;14(1):131-5.
•   Sharlip ID, Jarow JP, Belker AM, Lipshultz LI, Sigman M, Thomas AJ, Schlegel PN, Howards SS, Nehra A, Damewood MD, Overstreet JW, Sadovsky R
  Best practice policies for male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2002 May;77(5):873-82. Review.
•   WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen
  World Health Organization. 2010;5th ed.
•   Willott GM
  Frequency of azoospermia. Forensic Sci Int. 1982 Jul-Aug;20(1):9-10.

Surgical Sperm Retrieval in Non-obstructive Azoospermic Men: Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction vs. Multiple Needle-pass Percutaneous Testicular Sperm Aspiration

Details for clinical trial NCT03550716