Clinical trial NCT00488735 - References

Neck Pain — Subacute and Chronic, Non-specific Back and Neck Pain: Cognitive-behavioral Rehabilitation vs. Traditional Primary Care

Citation(s)

•   Alexanderson K, Norlund A
  Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Chapter 1. Aim, background, key concepts, regulations, and current statistics. Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2004;63:12-30. Review.
•   Brown H, Prescott R: Applied mixed models in medicine
  Edinburgh: John Wiley & Sons LTD; 199-259, 2001.
•   Lindell O, Eriksson L, Strender LE
  The reliability of a 10-test package for patients with prolonged back and neck pain: could an examiner without formal medical education be used without loss of quality? A methodological study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord.
•   Lindström I, Ohlund C, Eek C, Wallin L, Peterson LE, Fordyce WE, Nachemson AL
  The effect of graded activity on patients with subacute low back pain: a randomized prospective clinical study with an operant-conditioning behavioral approach. Phys Ther. 1992 Apr;72(4):279-90; discussion 291-3.
•   Linton SJ: Utility of cognitive-behavioral psychological treatments
  In Neck and back pain. The scientific evidence of causes, diagnosis, and treatment. Edited by Nachemson A, Jonson E. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Williams; 2000:361-381.
•   Söderström M, Englund L: Treatment of neck and low back pain in primary care
  In Neck and back pain. The scientific evidence of causes, diagnosis, and treatment. Edited by Nachemson A, Jonson E. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Williams; 2000:383-398.
•   Waddell G
  Low back pain: a twentieth century health care enigma. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Dec 15;21(24):2820-5.

Subacute and Chronic, Non-specific Back and Neck Pain: Cognitive-behavioral Rehabilitation Compared With Traditional Primary Care Concerning Sick-listing and Health-care Visits. A Randomized Controlled Trial, 18-month Follow-up

Details for clinical trial NCT00488735