Mortality Prediction — Validity of SOFA Score as Predictor of Mortality in Critically-ill Burn Patients
Citation(s)
Andrias A, Hanafie A, Wijaya DW Comparison of APACHE II, SOFA, and CSOFA Scoring System Validity as Mortality Predictor in ICU Patients in H. Adam Malik General Hospital. J Anestesi Perioper. 2017;5(1):17-23j.
Bouch DC, Thompson JP Severity scoring systems in the critically ill. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2008;8(5):181-5.
Carson J, Goverman J, Fagan S Acute renal failure in association with thermal injury. In: Herndon D, editor. Total Burn Care. 5th ed. Elsevier; 2018. p. 318-27.
Jain A, Palta S, Saroa R, Palta A, Sama S, Gombar S Sequential organ failure assessment scoring and prediction of patient's outcome in Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary care hospital. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jul-Sep;32(3):364-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.168165.
Karlie J, Wardhana A External Validation of Belgian Outcome of Burn Injury Score on Burned Patient In Burn Unit Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital. New Ropanasuri J Surg. 2017;2(1):90.
Marck RE, Montagne HL, Tuinebreijer WE, Breederveld RS Time course of thrombocytes in burn patients and its predictive value for outcome. Burns. 2013 Jun;39(4):714-22. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.01.015. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
Nair R, Bhandary NM, D'Souza AD Initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score versus Simplified Acute Physiology score to analyze multiple organ dysfunction in infectious diseases in Intensive Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2016 Apr;20(4):210-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.180041.
Nielson CB, Duethman NC, Howard JM, Moncure M, Wood JG Burns: Pathophysiology of Systemic Complications and Current Management. J Burn Care Res. 2017 Jan/Feb;38(1):e469-e481. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000355. Review.
Queiroz LF, Anami EH, Zampar EF, Tanita MT, Cardoso LT, Grion CM Epidemiology and outcome analysis of burn patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit in a University Hospital. Burns. 2016 May;42(3):655-62. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.08.002. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
Sunaryo A, Redjeki IS, Bisri T Perbandingan Validasi APACHE II dan SOFA Score untuk Memperkirakan Mortalitas Pasien yang Dirawat di Ruang Perawatan Intensif. Majalah Kedokteran Terapi Intensif. 2012;2(1):11-20.
Taofik S, Senapathi TGA, Wiryana M Comparison Of Validity Apache II, SOFA And Customized Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (Csofa) For Predicting Non-Surgical Patient. J Anestesiol Indones. 2015;7(2):102-13.
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.
