Clinical trial NCT01034930 - References

MANDIBLE — Clinical Study on the Efficiency of Three Different Attachment Systems for Implant-supported Mandibular Overdenture

Citation(s)

•   Boerrigter EM, van Oort RP, Raghoebar GM, Stegenga B, Schoen PJ, Boering G
  A controlled clinical trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: clinical aspects. J Oral Rehabil. 1997 Mar;24(3):182-90.
•   Cristache CM, Ionescu C, Burlibasa M, Cristache G, Iliescu AA, Dumitriu HT
  Retentive anchors versus magnets as attachment systems for mandibular overdenture. A 5-year prospective randomised clinical study.Metalurgia International vol. XIV (2009) special
•   Cristache CM, Ionescu C, Cristache G, Ionescu I, Iliescu AA, Burlibasa M
  A 5-year prospective randomised clinical trial on the efficiency of two different attachment systems as retention for implant-supported mandibular overdenture. Radiographic assessme
•   Cristache CM, Muntianu LA, Burlibasa M, Didilescu AC
  Five-year clinical trial using three attachment systems for implant overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Feb;25(2):e171-8. doi: 10.1111/clr.12086. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
•   Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, Head T, Lund JP, MacEntee M, Mericske-Stern R, Mojon P, Morais J, Naert I, Payne AG, Penrod J, Stoker GT, Tawse-Smith A, Taylor TD, Thomason JM, Thomson WM, Wismeijer D
  The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Montreal, Quebec, May 24-25, 2002. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 Jul-Aug;17(4):601-2. Review.
•   Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Batenburg RH, Visser A, Vissink A
  Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jul;20(7):722-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01710.x. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
•   Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Batenburg RH, Vissink A
  Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Sep;36(9):799-806. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01442.x. Epub 2009 Jun 26.
•   Naert I, Alsaadi G, Quirynen M
  Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study. Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Jul-Aug;17(4):401-10.
•   Naert I, Alsaadi G, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M
  A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: peri-implant outcome. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Sep-Oct;19(5):695-702.
•   Thomason JM, Feine J, Exley C, Moynihan P, Müller F, Naert I, Ellis JS, Barclay C, Butterworth C, Scott B, Lynch C, Stewardson D, Smith P, Welfare R, Hyde P, McAndrew R, Fenlon M, Barclay S, Barker D
  Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients--the York Consensus Statement. Br Dent J. 2009 Aug 22;207(4):185-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.728.
•   van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I, Maffei G, Jacobs R
  Marginal bone loss around implants retaining hinging mandibular overdentures, at 4-, 8- and 12-years follow-up. J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Jul;28(7):628-33.

A 5-year Prospective Randomised Clinical Study on the Efficiency of Three Different Attachment Systems as Retention for Implant-supported Mandibular Overdenture.

Details for clinical trial NCT01034930