Clinical trial NCT03928886 - References

Mammography Related Discomfort — Discomfort Assessment of Senographe Pristina Patient-assisted Versus Standard Compression Mode and Quality Assessment of Screening Mammograms

Citation(s)

•   American Cancer Society, "Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2015-2016," United States, 2015
  
•   Coldman A, Phillips N, Wilson C, Decker K, Chiarelli AM, Brisson J, Zhang B, Payne J, Doyle G, Ahmad R
  Pan-Canadian study of mammography screening and mortality from breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Oct 1;106(11). pii: dju261. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju261. Print 2014 Nov. Erratum in: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Jan;107(1):dju404 doi:10.1093/jnci/dju404.
•   de Groot JE, Branderhorst W, Grimbergen CA, den Heeten GJ, Broeders MJM
  Towards personalized compression in mammography: a comparison study between pressure- and force-standardization. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Mar;84(3):384-391. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.005. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
•   de Groot JE, Broeders MJ, Branderhorst W, den Heeten GJ, Grimbergen CA
  Mammographic compression after breast conserving therapy: controlling pressure instead of force. Med Phys. 2014 Feb;41(2):023501. doi: 10.1118/1.4862512.
•   Dullum JR, Lewis EC, Mayer JA
  Rates and correlates of discomfort associated with mammography. Radiology. 2000 Feb;214(2):547-52.
•   Gupta R, Nayak M, Khoursheed M, Roy S, Behbehani AI
  Pain during mammography: impact of breast pathologies and demographic factors. Med Princ Pract. 2003 Jul-Sep;12(3):180-3.
•   Hendrick RE, Smith RA, Rutledge JH 3rd, Smart CR
  Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40-49: a new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997;(22):87-92.
•   Hofvind S, Ursin G, Tretli S, Sebuødegård S, Møller B
  Breast cancer mortality in participants of the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. Cancer. 2013 Sep 1;119(17):3106-12. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28174. Epub 2013 May 29.
•   Kornguth PJ, Rimer BK, Conaway MR, Sullivan DC, Catoe KE, Stout AL, Brackett JS
  Impact of patient-controlled compression on the mammography experience. Radiology. 1993 Jan;186(1):99-102.
•   Li Y, Poulos A, McLean D, Rickard M
  A review of methods of clinical image quality evaluation in mammography. Eur J Radiol. 2010 Jun;74(3):e122-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.069. Epub 2009 May 30. Review.
•   M
  Boyce, "Comparing the use and interpretation of PGMI scoring to assess the technical quality of screening mammograms in the UK and Norway," Radiography, 2015.
•   Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan BK, Humphrey L; U
  S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):727-37, W237-42. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00009. Review.
•   Poulos A, Rickard M
  Compression in mammography and the perception of discomfort. Australas Radiol. 1997 Aug;41(3):247-52.
•   S
  Hofvind, "Quality assurance of mammograms in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.," European Journal of Radiology, 2009.
•   Shapiro S, Strax P, Venet L
  Periodic breast cancer screening in reducing mortality from breast cancer. JAMA. 1971 Mar 15;215(11):1777-85.
•   Swedish Organised Service Screening Evaluation Group
  Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography: 1. Further confirmation with extended data. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Jan;15(1):45-51.
•   Tabár L, Vitak B, Chen HH, Yen MF, Duffy SW, Smith RA
  Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer. 2001 May 1;91(9):1724-31.
•   Taplin SH, Rutter CM, Finder C, Mandelson MT, Houn F, White E
  Screening mammography: clinical image quality and the risk of interval breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Apr;178(4):797-803.
•   Thurfjell EL, Lindgren JA
  Breast cancer survival rates with mammographic screening: similar favorable survival rates for women younger and those older than 50 years. Radiology. 1996 Nov;201(2):421-6.
•   Whelehan P, Evans A, Wells M, Macgillivray S
  The effect of mammography pain on repeat participation in breast cancer screening: a systematic review. Breast. 2013 Aug;22(4):389-94. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 Mar 28. Review.
•   Williamson A, Hoggart B
  Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804. Review.

Discomfort Assessment of Senographe Pristina Patient-assisted Versus Standard Compression Mode in Asymptomatic Adult Women Undergoing Screening Full-filled Digital Mammography and Quality Evaluation of Screening Mammograms

Details for clinical trial NCT03928886