Clinical trial NCT01246830 - References

Malocclusion — The Use of 2D and 3D Imaging Modalities and Its Influence on Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Orthodontics

Citation(s)

•   Broadbent BH
  A new x-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthodontist 1931;51: 115-150
•   Brown AA, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG
  Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images. Angle Orthod. 2009 Jan;79(1):150-7. doi: 10.2319/122407-599.1.
•   Carter L, Farman AG, Geist J, Scarfe WC, Angelopoulos C, Nair MK, Hildebolt CF, Tyndall D, Shrout M; American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
  American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology executive opinion statement on performing and interpreting diagnostic cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Oct;106(4):561-2. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.07.007.
•   de Oliveira AE, Cevidanes LH, Phillips C, Motta A, Burke B, Tyndall D
  Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Feb;107(2):256-65. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.05.039. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
•   Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Sanderink G
  Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position. Eur J Orthod. 2009 Apr;31(2):129-34. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn088. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
•   Lou L, Lagravere MO, Compton S, Major PW, Flores-Mir C
  Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Sep;104(3):402-11. Epub 2006 Oct 27. Review.
•   Olszewski R, Cosnard G, Macq B, Mahy P, Reychler H
  3D CT-based cephalometric analysis: 3D cephalometric theoretical concept and software. Neuroradiology. 2006 Nov;48(11):853-62. Epub 2006 Sep 29.
•   Olszewski R, Tanesy O, Cosnard G, Zech F, Reychler H
  Reproducibility of osseous landmarks used for computed tomography based three-dimensional cephalometric analyses. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010 Apr;38(3):214-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
•   Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG
  Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod. 2008 May;78(3):387-95. doi: 10.2319/122106-52.1.
•   Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr
  , Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th ed, Mosby Inc., Elsevier Science, Philadelphia, 2006.
•   Scarfe WC, Farman AG
  What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am. 2008 Oct;52(4):707-30, v. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.005.
•   Swennen GR, Schutyser F, Barth EL, De Groeve P, De Mey A
  A new method of 3-D cephalometry Part I: the anatomic Cartesian 3-D reference system. J Craniofac Surg. 2006 Mar;17(2):314-25.
•   Swennen GR, Schutyser F
  Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Sep;130(3):410-6.
•   White SC, Pharoah MJ
  The evolution and application of dental maxillofacial imaging modalities. Dent Clin North Am. 2008 Oct;52(4):689-705, v. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.006.

The Use of 2D and 3D Imaging Modalities and Its Influence on Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Orthodontics

Details for clinical trial NCT01246830