Clinical trial NCT04465149 - References

Local Anesthetic Efficacy — Efficacy of Differents Anaesthetics in Mandibular Third Molar Germectomy

Citation(s)

•   Abazarpoor R, Parirokh M, Nakhaee N, Abbott PV
  A Comparison of Different Volumes of Articaine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Molar Teeth with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis. J Endod. 2015 Sep;41(9):1408-11. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.05.015. Epub
•   Almpani K, Kolokitha OE
  Role of third molars in orthodontics. World J Clin Cases. 2015 Feb 16;3(2):132-40. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i2.132. Review.
•   Becker DE, Reed KL
  Local anesthetics: review of pharmacological considerations. Anesth Prog. 2012 Summer;59(2):90-101; quiz 102-3. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-59.2.90. Review.
•   Bjørnland T, Haanaes HR, Lind PO, Zachrisson B
  Removal of third molar germs. Study of complications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987 Aug;16(4):385-90.
•   Chiapasco M, Crescentini M, Romanoni G
  [The extraction of the lower third molars: germectomy or late avulsion?]. Minerva Stomatol. 1994 May;43(5):191-8. Italian.
•   Corbett IP, Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG
  Articaine infiltration for anesthesia of mandibular first molars. J Endod. 2008 May;34(5):514-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.042.
•   Cowan A
  Clinical assessment of a new local anesthetic agent-carticaine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1977 Feb;43(2):174-80.
•   Dudkiewicz A, Schwartz S, Laliberté R
  Effectiveness of mandibular infiltration in children using the local anesthetic Ultracaine (articaine hydrochloride). J Can Dent Assoc. 1987 Jan;53(1):29-31.
•   Eccleston C
  Role of psychology in pain management. Br J Anaesth. 2001 Jul;87(1):144-52. Review.
•   Flanagan DF
  The effectiveness of articaine in mandibular facial infiltrations. Local Reg Anesth. 2015 Dec 18;9:1-6. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S94647. eCollection 2016.
•   Gazal G, Fareed WM, Zafar MS
  Role of intraseptal anesthesia for pain-free dental treatment. Saudi J Anaesth. 2016 Jan-Mar;10(1):81-6. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.169482. Review.
•   Gazal G
  Comparison of speed of action and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine for pulpal anesthesia in mandibular teeth: A randomized, double-blind cross-over trial. Eur J Dent. 2015 Apr-Jun;9(2):201-206. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.156811
•   Gunter JB
  Benefit and risks of local anesthetics in infants and children. Paediatr Drugs. 2002;4(10):649-72. Review.
•   Heller AA, Shankland WE 2nd
  Alternative to the inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia when placing mandibular dental implants posterior to the mental foramen. J Oral Implantol. 2001;27(3):127-33.
•   Jastak JT, Yagiela JA
  Vasoconstrictors and local anesthesia: a review and rationale for use. J Am Dent Assoc. 1983 Oct;107(4):623-30. Review.
•   Kämmerer PW, Palarie V, Daubländer M, Bicer C, Shabazfar N, Brüllmann D, Al-Nawas B
  Comparison of 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100,000) and without epinephrine in inferior alveolar block for tooth extraction: double-blind randomized clinical trial of
•   Kaufman E, Epstein JB, Naveh E, Gorsky M, Gross A, Cohen G
  A survey of pain, pressure, and discomfort induced by commonly used oral local anesthesia injections. Anesth Prog. 2005 Winter;52(4):122-7.
•   Khoury J, Townsend G
  Neural blockade anaesthesia of the mandibular nerve and its terminal branches: rationale for different anaesthetic techniques including their advantages and disadvantages. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:307423. doi: 10.1155/2011/30
•   Leith R, Lynch K, O'Connell AC
  Articaine use in children: a review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2012 Dec;13(6):293-6. Review.
•   Leuschner J, Leblanc D
  Studies on the toxicological profile of the local anaesthetic articaine. Arzneimittelforschung. 1999 Feb;49(2):126-32.
•   Malamed SF
  Is the mandibular nerve block passé? J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Sep;142 Suppl 3:3S-7S.
•   Meechan JG
  The use of the mandibular infiltration anesthetic technique in adults. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Sep;142 Suppl 3:19S-24S. Review.
•   Milgrom P, Coldwell SE, Getz T, Weinstein P, Ramsay DS
  Four dimensions of fear of dental injections. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997 Jun;128(6):756-66.
•   Mittal M, Sharma S, Kumar A, Chopra R, Srivastava D
  Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine During Primary Maxillary Molar Extractions in Children. Pediatr Dent. 2015 Nov-Dec;37(7):520-4.
•   Pabst L, Nusstein J, Drum M, Reader A, Beck M
  The efficacy of a repeated buccal infiltration of articaine in prolonging duration of pulpal anesthesia in the mandibular first molar. Anesth Prog. 2009 Winter;56(4):128-34. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-56.4.128.
•   Pellicer-Chover H, Cervera-Ballester J, Sanchis-Bielsa JM, Peñarrocha-Diago MA, Peñarrocha-Diago M, García-Mira B
  Comparative split-mouth study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine in impacted mandibular third molar extracti
•   Perillo L, Vitale M, d'Apuzzo F, Isola G, Nucera R, Matarese G
  Interdisciplinary approach for a patient with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Jun;153(6):883-894. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.12.035.
•   Ram D, Peretz B
  Administering local anaesthesia to paediatric dental patients -- current status and prospects for the future. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2002 Mar;12(2):80-9. Review.
•   Ramadurai N, Gurunathan D, Samuel AV, Subramanian E, Rodrigues SJL
  Effectiveness of 2% Articaine as an anesthetic agent in children: randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Sep;23(9):3543-3550. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2775-5. Epub 2018 Dec
•   Raucci G, Pachêco-Pereira C, Elyasi M, d'Apuzzo F, Flores-Mir C, Perillo L
  Short- and long-term evaluation of mandibular dental arch dimensional changes in patients treated with a lip bumper during mixed dentition followed by fixed appliances. Angle Orth
•   Rayati F, Noruziha A, Jabbarian R
  Efficacy of buccal infiltration anaesthesia with articaine for extraction of mandibular molars: a clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Sep;56(7):607-610. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
•   Saxena P, Gupta SK, Newaskar V, Chandra A
  Advances in dental local anesthesia techniques and devices: An update. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jan;4(1):19-24. doi: 10.4103/0975-5950.117873. Review.
•   Sierra Rebolledo A, Delgado Molina E, Berini Aytís L, Gay Escoda C
  Comparative study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block during surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars. Med Oral Patol
•   Srisurang S, Narit L, Prisana P
  Clinical efficacy of lidocaine, mepivacaine, and articaine for local infiltration. J Investig Clin Dent. 2011 Feb;2(1):23-8. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1626.2010.00035.x. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
•   Tófoli GR, Ramacciato JC, de Oliveira PC, Volpato MC, Groppo FC, Ranali J
  Comparison of effectiveness of 4% articaine associated with 1: 100,000 or 1: 200,000 epinephrine in inferior alveolar nerve block. Anesth Prog. 2003;50(4):164-8.
•   Vigen EC, Lasse A
  Articaine hydrochloride: is it the solution?. Dent Update. 2015 Jun;42(5):493.
•   Vree TB, Gielen MJ
  Clinical pharmacology and the use of articaine for local and regional anaesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005 Jun;19(2):293-308. Review.
•   Wright GZ, Weinberger SJ, Marti R, Plotzke O
  The effectiveness of infiltration anesthesia in the mandibular primary molar region. Pediatr Dent. 1991 Sep-Oct;13(5):278-83.

Comparative Study of the Anaesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine Versus 2% Mepivacaine in Mandibular Third Molar Germectomy Using Different Anaesthetic Techniques: a Split-mouth Clinical Trial

Details for clinical trial NCT04465149