NCT00002549 - Clinical Trial References

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Citation(s)

Mandelli F, Vignetti M, Suciu S, Stasi R, Petti MC, Meloni G, Muus P, Marmont F, Marie JP, Labar B, Thomas X, Di Raimondo F, Willemze R, Liso V, Ferrara F, Baila L, Fazi P, Zittoun R, Amadori S, de Witte T
Daunorubicin versus mitoxantrone versus idarubic
Maurillo L, Buccisano F, Spagnoli A, et al
: In acute myeloid leukemia, the use in induction of standard dose arac is associated with a better quality of response as compared to an induction regimen containing high dose arac. [Abstract] Blood 114 (22): A-1584, 2009.
Oosterveld, M, Suciu S, Muus P, et al
: A new prognostic disease specific model to predict survival after intensive antileukemic treatment for young patients with poor-risk MDS and AML: results of the CRIANT and AML-10 studies conducted by the EORTC/GIMEMA/SAKK/HOVON/EBMT groups. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-2020, 2004.

RANDOMIZED PHASE III STUDY OF INDUCTION (ICE VS MICE VS DCE) AND INTENSIVE CONSOLIDATION (IDIA VS NOVIA VS DIA) FOLLOWED BY BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION IN ACUTE MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA: AML 10 PROTOCOL

Details for clinical trial NCT00002549

Clinical trial NCT00002549 - References