Clinical Trials Logo

Citation(s)

  •   Ghai B, Sethi S, Ram J, Wig J
    Cuff filling volumes for pediatric classic laryngeal mask airways: comparison of clinical end points versus adjusted cuff pressure. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Feb;23(2):122-6. doi: 10.1111/pan.12023. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
  •   Keller C, Pühringer F, Brimacombe JR
    Influence of cuff volume on oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic position with the laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth. 1998 Aug;81(2):186-7.
  •   Li BB, Yan J, Zhou HG, Hao J, Liu AJ, Ma ZL
    Application of Minimum Effective Cuff Inflating Volume for Laryngeal Mask Airway and its Impact on Postoperative Pharyngeal Complications. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Oct 5;128(19):2570-6. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.166034.
  •   Ruananukun N, Watcharotayangul J, Jeeranukosol S, Komonhirun R
    Correlation and variation of cuff inflating volumes and pressures in different adult models of laryngeal mask: a prospective randomized trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 May 7;20(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01028-4.
  •   Seet E, Yousaf F, Gupta S, Subramanyam R, Wong DT, Chung F
    Use of manometry for laryngeal mask airway reduces postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events: a prospective, randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2010 Mar;112(3):652-7. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181cf4346.
  •   Shariffuddin II, Teoh WH, Tang E, Hashim N, Loh PS
    Ambu® AuraGain™ versus LMA Supreme™ Second Seal™: a randomised controlled trial comparing oropharyngeal leak pressures and gastric drain functionality in spontaneously breathing patients. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2017 Mar;45(2):244-250.

Three Inflation Methods of the Laryngeal Mask Airway Ambú Auragain™ and Its Pharyngolaryngeal Adverse Effects

Details for clinical trial NCT04795544