Clinical trial NCT04833166 - References

Intubation; Difficult or Failed — Comparing Full vs. Partial Glottis View Using CMAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope in Simulated Cervical Injury Patient

Citation(s)

•   Adnet F, Borron SW, Lapostolle F, Lapandry C
  The three axis alignment theory and the "sniffing position": perpetuation of an anatomic myth? Anesthesiology. 1999 Dec;91(6):1964-5.
•   Caplan RA, Posner KL, Ward RJ, Cheney FW
  Adverse respiratory events in anesthesia: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 1990 May;72(5):828-33.
•   Cavus E, Neumann T, Doerges V, Moeller T, Scharf E, Wagner K, Bein B, Serocki G
  First clinical evaluation of the C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope during routine and difficult intubation. Anesth Analg. 2011 Feb;112(2):382-5. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820553fb. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
•   Criswell JC, Parr MJ, Nolan JP
  Emergency airway management in patients with cervical spine injuries. Anaesthesia. 1994 Oct;49(10):900-3.
•   Gu Y, Robert J, Kovacs G, Milne AD, Morris I, Hung O, MacQuarrie K, Mackinnon S, Adam Law J
  A deliberately restricted laryngeal view with the GlideScope® video laryngoscope is associated with faster and easier tracheal intubation when compared with a full glottic view: a randomized clinical trial. Can J Anaesth. 2016 Aug;63(8):928-37. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0654-6. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
•   Jain D, Dhankar M, Wig J, Jain A
  Comparison of the conventional CMAC and the D-blade CMAC with the direct laryngoscopes in simulated cervical spine injury--a manikin study. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2014 Jul-Aug;64(4):269-74. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
•   Lewis SR, Butler AR, Parker J, Cook TM, Schofield-Robinson OJ, Smith AF
  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation: a Cochrane Systematic Review. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Sep 1;119(3):369-383. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex228.
•   Mort TC
  Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth Analg. 2004 Aug;99(2):607-13, table of contents.
•   Serocki G, Neumann T, Scharf E, Dörges V, Cavus E
  Indirect videolaryngoscopy with C-MAC D-Blade and GlideScope: a randomized, controlled comparison in patients with suspected difficult airways. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013 Feb;79(2):121-9. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
•   Stroumpoulis K, Pagoulatou A, Violari M, Ikonomou I, Kalantzi N, Kastrinaki K, Xanthos T, Michaloliakou C
  Videolaryngoscopy in the management of the difficult airway: a comparison with the Macintosh blade. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Mar;26(3):218-22. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32831c84d1.
•   Su YC, Chen CC, Lee YK, Lee JY, Lin KJ
  Comparison of video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Nov;28(11):788-95. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834a34f3.
•   van Zundert A, Maassen R, Lee R, Willems R, Timmerman M, Siemonsma M, Buise M, Wiepking M
  A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways. Anesth Analg. 2009 Sep;109(3):825-31. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ae39db.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Full Glottis View vs. Partial Glottis View During Intubation Using CMAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope in Simulated Cervical Injury Patient

Details for clinical trial NCT04833166