Intraocular Lens — Comparison of Quality of Vision After Bifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens Implantation
Citation(s)
Calladine D, Evans JR, Shah S, Leyland M Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;(9):CD003169. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003169.pub3. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 12;12 :CD003169.
Denoyer A, Le Lez ML, Majzoub S, Pisella PJ Quality of vision after cataract surgery after Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens implantation: effect of contrast sensitivity and wavefront aberration improvements on the quality of daily vision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Feb;33(2):210-6.
Kohnen T, Nuijts R, Levy P, Haefliger E, Alfonso JF Visual function after bilateral implantation of apodized diffractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses with a +3.0 D addition. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Dec;35(12):2062-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.08.013.
Thibos LN, Ye M, Zhang X, Bradley A The chromatic eye: a new reduced-eye model of ocular chromatic aberration in humans. Appl Opt. 1992 Jul 1;31(19):3594-600. doi: 10.1364/AO.31.003594.
Weeber HA, Piers PA Theoretical performance of intraocular lenses correcting both spherical and chromatic aberration. J Refract Surg. 2012 Jan;28(1):48-52. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20111103-01. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
Comparison of Quality of Vision After Bifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens Implantation
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.
