Clinical trial NCT04747301 - References

Induction of Labor — DOuble-BAlloon Versus PROstaglandin E2 for Cervical Ripening in Low Risk Pregnancies

Citation(s)

•   Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Uccella S, Agosti M, Serati M, Marchitelli G, Bolis P
  A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;207(2):125.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.05.020. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
•   de Vaan MD, Ten Eikelder ML, Jozwiak M, Palmer KR, Davies-Tuck M, Bloemenkamp KW, Mol BWJ, Boulvain M
  Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 18;10(10):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub3.
•   Dos Santos F, Drymiotou S, Antequera Martin A, Mol BW, Gale C, Devane D, Van't Hooft J, Johnson MJ, Hogg M, Thangaratinam S
  Development of a core outcome set for trials on induction of labour: an international multistakeholder Delphi study. BJOG. 2018 Dec;125(13):1673-1680. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15397. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
•   Du C, Liu Y, Liu Y, Ding H, Zhang R, Tan J
  Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;291(6):1221-7. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3547-3. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
•   Du YM, Zhu LY, Cui LN, Jin BH, Ou JL
  Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labour induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BJOG. 2017 May;124(6):891-899. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14256. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
•   Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G, Hill K, Thom EA, El-Sayed YY, Perez-Delboy A, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Boggess KA, Chauhan SP, Iams JD, Chien EK, Casey BM, Gibbs RS, Srinivas SK, Swamy GK, Simhan HN, Macones GA; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network
  Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):513-523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566.
•   Liu YR, Pu CX, Wang XY, Wang XY
  Double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone insert for labour induction: a meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Jan;299(1):7-12. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4929-8. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
•   Shechter-Maor G, Haran G, Sadeh-Mestechkin D, Ganor-Paz Y, Fejgin MD, Biron-Shental T
  Intra-vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus double-balloon catheter for labor induction in term oligohydramnios. J Perinatol. 2015 Feb;35(2):95-8. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.173. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
•   Suffecool K, Rosenn BM, Kam S, Mushi J, Foroutan J, Herrera K
  Labor induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix: double balloon catheter versus dinoprostone. J Perinat Med. 2014 Mar;42(2):213-8. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2013-0152.
•   Wang W, Zheng J, Fu J, Zhang X, Ma Q, Yu S, Li M, Hou L
  Which is the safer method of labor induction for oligohydramnios women? Transcervical double balloon catheter or dinoprostone vaginal insert. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Nov;27(17):1805-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.880880. Epub 2014 Feb 3.

The Effectiveness and Safety of Double-balloon Versus Vaginal Prostaglandin for Cervical Ripening in Women With Low-risk Pregnancies: A Randomized Controlled Trial (DOBA-PRO)

Details for clinical trial NCT04747301