Hearing Loss — Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Children With the MED-EL Cochlear Implant
Citation(s)
Au DK, Hui Y, Wei WI Superiority of bilateral cochlear implantation over unilateral cochlear implantation in tone discrimination in chinese patients. Am J Otolaryngol. 2003 Jan-Feb;24(1):19-23.
Au, D , Hui, Y., Wei, W, & Wong, B. (2002). Speech recognition between bilaterally and unilaterally cochlear implanted and hearing aid fitted users. In Kubo, T., Takahashi Y., & Iwaki, T. (Ed.) Cochlear implants - an update. The Hague: Kugler.
Balkany T, Boggess W, Dinner B Binaural cochlear implantation: comparison of 3M/House and Nucleus 22 devices with evidence of sensory integration. Laryngoscope. 1988 Oct;98(10):1040-3.
Beijen JW, Snik AF, Mylanus EA Sound localization ability of young children with bilateral cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol. 2007 Jun;28(4):479-85.
Brown KD, Balkany TJ Benefits of bilateral cochlear implantation: a review. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Oct;15(5):315-8. Review.
Das S, Buchman CA Bilateral cochlear implantation: current concepts. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Oct;13(5):290-3. Review.
Dorman MF, Dahlstrom L Speech understanding by cochlear-implant patients with different left- and right-ear electrode arrays. Ear Hear. 2004 Apr;25(2):191-4.
Dunn, L, Dunn, L (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test Third Edition. Circle Pines, Minnesota: American Guidance Service.
Erber, N (1982). Auditory Training. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association.
Jerger, S, Jerger, J (1984). Pediatric Speech Intelligibility Test. St. Louis, Missouri: Auditec of St. Louis.
Kaufman, N (1995). Kaufman Speech Praxis Test for Children. Detroit, Michigan: Wayne State University Press.
Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Osberger MJ Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 1995 Oct;16(5):470-81.
Kong W, Yu L, Xu Y, Yue J, Xiong X, Zhu L, Duan J [Benefit of bilateral cochlear implantation on congenital prelingually deafened Chinese-speaking children]. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2003 Oct;17(10):577-9. Chinese.
Laback B, Pok SM, Baumgartner WD, Deutsch WA, Schmid K Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors. Ear Hear. 2004 Oct;25(5):488-500.
Lawson, D, Zerbi, M, Wilson, B (1998). First quarterly progress report: Speech processors for auditory prostheses. NIH Contract N01-DC-8-2105.
Lawson, D , Wilson, B., Zerbi, M., & Finley, C. (1996). Fifth Quarterly Progress Report. NIH Contract N01-DC-5-2103. Retrieved from http://npp.ninds.nih.gov/ProgressReports/Speech ProcessorsforAuditoryProstheses%20DC52103/qpr5/qpr5.html.
Lawson, D , Wilson, B., Zerbi, M., & Finley, C. (1999). Fourth Quarterly Progress Report. NIH Contract N01-DC-8-2105. Retrieved from http://npp.ninds.nih.gov/ProgressReports/Speech ProcessorsforAuditoryProstheses%20DC82105/SpeechProcessorsWilson4DC82105.pdf
Lawson, D , Zerbi, M., & Wilson, B. (1998). First Quarterly Progress Report. NIH Contract N01-DC-8-2105. Retrieved from http://npp.ninds.nih.gov/ProgressReports/SpeechProcessorsfor AuditoryProstheses%20DC82105/qpr1/qpr1a.html
Long CJ, Eddington DK, Colburn HS, Rabinowitz WM Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Sep;114(3):1565-74.
Müller J, Schön F, Helms J Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant system. Ear Hear. 2002 Jun;23(3):198-206.
Müller, J , Schoen, F., & Helms, J. (2000). Bilateral cochlear implant - new aspects for the future? In Kim, C. S., Chang, S. O. & Lim, D. (Ed.) Updates in cochlear implantation. Adv. Otorhinolarygol., Basel: Karger.
Müller, J , Schön, F., & Helms J. (1998). Binaural cochlear implantation: a case report discussing preliminary results. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 255, 38.
Nopp P, Schleich P, D'Haese P Sound localization in bilateral users of MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2004 Jun;25(3):205-14.
Schleich P, Nopp P, D'Haese P Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant. Ear Hear. 2004 Jun;25(3):197-204.
Schoen F, Mueller J, Helms J, Nopp P Sound localization and sensitivity to interaural cues in bilateral users of the Med-El Combi 40/40+cochlear implant system. Otol Neurotol. 2005 May;26(3):429-37.
Schön F, Müller J, Helms J Speech reception thresholds obtained in a symmetrical four-loudspeaker arrangement from bilateral users of MED-EL cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol. 2002 Sep;23(5):710-4.
Schön, F, Mueller, J, Helms, J (1999). Results of bilateral cochlear implantation. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 156:106.
Seeber BU, Baumann U, Fastl H Localization ability with bimodal hearing aids and bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Sep;116(3):1698-709.
Semel, E, Wiig, E, Secord, W (2003). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals Fourth Edition. San Antonio, Texas: The Psychological Corporation
Senn P, Kompis M, Vischer M, Haeusler R Minimum audible angle, just noticeable interaural differences and speech intelligibility with bilateral cochlear implants using clinical speech processors. Audiol Neurootol. 2005 Nov-Dec;10(6):342-52. Epub 2005 Aug 5.
Sharma A, Dorman MF, Kral A The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants. Hear Res. 2005 May;203(1-2):134-43.
Stark T, Engel A, Borkowski G [Bilateral cochlea implantation in varying duration of deafness]. Laryngorhinootologie. 2004 Jan;83(1):20-2. German.
Tyler RS, Witt SA, Dunn CC Trade-offs between better hearing and better cosmetics. Am J Audiol. 2004 Dec;13(2):193-9.
Van Hoesel R, Ramsden R, Odriscoll M Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user. Ear Hear. 2002 Apr;23(2):137-49.
Van Hoesel RJ, Clark GM Fusion and lateralization study with two binaural cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995 Sep;166:233-5.
van Hoesel RJ, Clark GM Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Jul;102(1):495-507.
van Hoesel RJ, Tong YC, Hollow RD, Clark GM Psychophysical and speech perception studies: a case report on a binaural cochlear implant subject. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Dec;94(6):3178-89.
van Hoesel RJ, Tyler RS Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Mar;113(3):1617-30.
van Hoesel RJ Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol. 2004 Jul-Aug;9(4):234-46.
van Hoesel, R J. M., & Clark, G. M. (1999). Speech results with a bilateral multi-channel cochlear implant subject for spatially separated signal and noise. Australian Journal of Audiology, 21, 23-28.
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.