Clinical Trials Logo

Citation(s)

  •   Cox RM, Alexander GC, Gilmore C
    Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST). Ear Hear. 1987 Oct;8(5 Suppl):119S-126S. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198710001-00010.
  •   Gabrielsson A, Schenkman BN, Hagerman B
    The effects of different frequency responses on sound quality judgments and speech intelligibility. J Speech Hear Res. 1988 Jun;31(2):166-77. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3102.166.
  •   Kuk F, Keenan D, Lau CC
    Vent configurations on subjective and objective occlusion effect. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005 Oct;16(9):747-62. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16.9.11.
  •   Saleh HK, Folkeard P, Macpherson E, Scollie S
    Adaptation of the Connected Speech Test: Rerecording and Passage Equivalency. Am J Audiol. 2020 Jun 8;29(2):259-264. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJA-19-00052. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
  •   Vasil-Dilaj KA, Cienkowski KM
    The influence of receiver size on magnitude of acoustic and perceived measures of occlusion. Am J Audiol. 2011 Jun;20(1):61-8. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2010/09-0031). Epub 2011 Jan 28.
  •   Voss SC, Pichora-Fuller MK, Ishida I, Pereira A, Seiter J, El Guindi N, Kuehnel V, Qian J
    Evaluating the benefit of hearing aids with motion-based beamformer adaptation in a real-world setup. Int J Audiol. 2022 Aug;61(8):642-654. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1948120. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
  •   Winkler A, Latzel M, Holube I
    Open Versus Closed Hearing-Aid Fittings: A Literature Review of Both Fitting Approaches. Trends Hear. 2016 Feb 15;20:2331216516631741. doi: 10.1177/2331216516631741.

Lab Evaluation of Novel Hearing Aid Coupling Method

Details for clinical trial NCT05377359