Healthy Volunteer — Characterization of Independant Task Neural Correlates of Different Levels of Mental Workload
Citation(s)
Akerstedt T, Gillberg M Subjective and objective sleepiness in the active individual. Int J Neurosci. 1990 May;52(1-2):29-37.
Allison BZ, Polich J Workload assessment of computer gaming using a single-stimulus event-related potential paradigm. Biol Psychol. 2008 Mar;77(3):277-83. Epub 2007 Nov 4.
Antonenko, P , Paas, F., Grabner, R., & Gog, T. (2010). Using Electroencephalography to Measure Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 425-438.
Baldwin CL, Penaranda BN Adaptive training using an artificial neural network and EEG metrics for within- and cross-task workload classification. Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 2;59(1):48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.047. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
Barachant, A (2012) Commande robuste d'un effecteur par une interface cerveau-machine EEG asynchrone. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université de Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
Bashashati A, Fatourechi M, Ward RK, Birch GE A survey of signal processing algorithms in brain-computer interfaces based on electrical brain signals. J Neural Eng. 2007 Jun;4(2):R32-57. Epub 2007 Mar 27. Review.
Besserve, M , Martinerie, J., & Garnero, L. (2008). Non-invasive classification of cortical activities for brain computer interface: A variable selection approach (p. 1063-1066). IEEE.
Cain, B (2007) "A review of the mental workload literature 1.0".
Christensen JC, Estepp JR, Wilson GF, Russell CA The effects of day-to-day variability of physiological data on operator functional state classification. Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 2;59(1):57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.091. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
Comstock, J R., Jr., & Arnegard, R. J. (1992) The Multi-Attribute Task Battery for human operator workload and strategic behavior research (NASA TM-104174). Hampton, Virginia: NASA Langley Research Center.
D Levendowsk, Z. Konstantinovic, R. Olmstead, and C. Berka (2000). Method for the quantification of human alertness, patent.
Fu, S & Parasuraman, R. (2007) Event-related potentials (ERPs) in Neuroergonomics. . In Parasuraman, R. & Rizzo, M. (Eds), Neuroergonomics: The brain at work (pp. 15-31). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.
George, L , & Lécuyer, A. (2010). An overview of research on " passive " brain-computer interfaces for implicit human-computer interaction. International Conference on Applied Bionics and Biomechanics (ICABB), Venice, Italy, October 14-16, 2010.
Gevins A, Smith ME Neurophysiological measures of working memory and individual differences in cognitive ability and cognitive style. Cereb Cortex. 2000 Sep;10(9):829-39.
Gevins, A & Smith, M. E. (2007) Electroencephalography (EEG) in Neuroergnomics. In Parasuraman, R. & Rizzo, M. (Eds), Neuroergonomics: The brain at work (pp. 15-31). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.
Gevins, A , & Smith, M. E. (2003). Neurophysiological measures of cognitive workload during human-computer interaction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 1, 113-131.
Gomarus HK, Althaus M, Wijers AA, Minderaa RB The effects of memory load and stimulus relevance on the EEG during a visual selective memory search task: an ERP and ERD/ERS study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;117(4):871-84. Epub 2006 Jan 25.
Graimann, B, Allison, B & Pfurstscheller, G. (2010) Brain-computer interfaces: A gentle introduction. In Graimann, B, Allison, B. & Pfurstscheller, G. (Eds) Brain-computer interfaces: Revolutionizing human-computer interaction, (pp. 1-28), Berlin Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.
Grimes, D , Tan, D. S., Hudson, S. E., Shenoy, P., & Rao, R. P. N. (2008). Feasibility and pragmatics of classifying working memory load with an electroencephalograph (p. 835). ACM Press.
Heger, D , Putze, F., & Schultz, T. (2010). Online workload recognition from EEG data during cognitive tests and human-machine interaction. KI 2010: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 410-417.
Honal, M , & Schultz, T. (2008). Determine task demand from brain activity. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Bio-inspired Systems and Signal Processing.
Kahol K, Smith M, Brandenberger J, Ashby A, Ferrara JJ Impact of fatigue on neurophysiologic measures of surgical residents. J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jul;213(1):29-34; discussion 34-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.03.028. Epub 2011 Apr 23.
KIRCHNER WK Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. J Exp Psychol. 1958 Apr;55(4):352-8.
Kok A On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology. 2001 May;38(3):557-77. Review.
Koles ZJ, Flor-Henry P Mental activity and the e.e.g.: task and workload related effects. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1981 Mar;19(2):185-94.
McDonald NJ, Soussou W QUASAR's QStates cognitive gauge performance in the cognitive state assessment competition 2011. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:6542-6. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091614.
Miller MW, Rietschel JC, McDonald CG, Hatfield BD A novel approach to the physiological measurement of mental workload. Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 Apr;80(1):75-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Feb 20.
Natani, K , & Gomer, F. E. (1981). Electrocortical activity and operator workload: A comparison of changes in the electroencephalogram and in event-related potentials. (McDonnell Douglas Technical Report E2427). Long Beach, CA: McDonnell Douglas Corporation.
Nourbakhsh, N , Wang, Y., & Chen, F. (2013). GSR and Blink Features for Cognitive Load Classification. In P. Kotzé, G. Marsden, G. Lindgaard, J. Wesson, & M. Winckler (Éd.), Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2013 (Vol. 8117, p. 159-166). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Putze, F , Jarvis, J. P., & Schultz, T. (2010) Multimodal Recognition of Cognitive Workload for Multitasking in the Car. International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 20, 3748-3751.
Schober F, Schellenberg R, Dimpfel W Reflection of mental exercise in the dynamic quantitative topographical EEG. Neuropsychobiology. 1995;31(2):98-112.
Schultheis, H & Jameson, A. (2004) Assessing Cognitive Load in Adaptive Hypermedia Systems: Physiological and Behavioral Methods. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 313, 225-234.
Sternberg S High-speed scanning in human memory. Science. 1966 Aug 5;153(3736):652-4.
Sternberg S Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. Am Sci. 1969 Winter;57(4):421-57.
Tanaka Y, Yamaoka K Blink activity and task difficulty. Percept Mot Skills. 1993 Aug;77(1):55-66.
Tremoulet, P D., Craven, P. L., Regli, S. H., Wilcox, S., Barton, J., Stibler and K., Clark, M. (2009). Workload-Based Assessment of a User Interface Design. In V. G. Duffy (Éd.), Digital Human Modeling (Vol. 5620, p. 333-342). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Veltman JA, Gaillard AW Physiological indices of workload in a simulated flight task. Biol Psychol. 1996 Feb 5;42(3):323-42.
Wang Z, Hope RM, Wang Z, Ji Q, Gray WD Cross-subject workload classification with a hierarchical Bayes model. Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 2;59(1):64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.094. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
Zander, T O., Kothe, C., Jatzev, S. & Gaertner, M. (2010) Enhancing human-computer interaction with input from active and passive brain-computer interfaces. In Tan, D.S. & Nijholt, A. (Eds) Brain-computer interfaces: Applying our minds to human-computer interaction (pp. 181-196), London, Springer-Verlag.
Characterization of Independant Task Neural Correlates of Different Levels of Mental Workload
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.
