Headache — Intravenous Fluids in Benign Headaches Trial
Citation(s)
Balbin JE, Nerenberg R, Baratloo A, Friedman BW Intravenous fluids for migraine: a post hoc analysis of clinical trial data. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Apr;34(4):713-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.12.080. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
Callan JE, Kostic MA, Bachrach EA, Rieg TS Prochlorperazine vs. promethazine for headache treatment in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial. J Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;35(3):247-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.09.047. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
Cicek M, Karcioglu O, Parlak I, Ozturk V, Duman O, Serinken M, Guryay M Prospective, randomised, double blind, controlled comparison of metoclopramide and pethidine in the emergency treatment of acute primary vascular and tension type headache episodes. Emerg Med J. 2004 May;21(3):323-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2002.000356.
Coppola M, Yealy DM, Leibold RA Randomized, placebo-controlled evaluation of prochlorperazine versus metoclopramide for emergency department treatment of migraine headache. Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Nov;26(5):541-6. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70001-3.
Dychter SS, Gold DA, Carson D, Haller M Intravenous therapy: a review of complications and economic considerations of peripheral access. J Infus Nurs. 2012 Mar-Apr;35(2):84-91. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0b013e31824237ce.
Friedman BW, Adewunmi V, Campbell C, Solorzano C, Esses D, Bijur PE, Gallagher EJ A randomized trial of intravenous ketorolac versus intravenous metoclopramide plus diphenhydramine for tension-type and all nonmigraine, noncluster recurrent headaches. Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;62(4):311-318.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.03.017. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
Friedman BW, West J, Vinson DR, Minen MT, Restivo A, Gallagher EJ Current management of migraine in US emergency departments: an analysis of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Cephalalgia. 2015 Apr;35(4):301-9. doi: 10.1177/0333102414539055. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
Gentges J, Arthur A, Stamile T, Figureido M Peripheral Intravenous Line Placement and Utilization in an Academic Emergency Department. J Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;50(2):235-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.08.006.
Homer LD, Holmes KR Risks associated with 72- and 96-hour peripheral intravenous catheter dwell times. J Intraven Nurs. 1998 Sep-Oct;21(5):301-5.
Jones J, Sklar D, Dougherty J, White W Randomized double-blind trial of intravenous prochlorperazine for the treatment of acute headache. JAMA. 1989 Feb 24;261(8):1174-6.
Kostic MA, Gutierrez FJ, Rieg TS, Moore TS, Gendron RT A prospective, randomized trial of intravenous prochlorperazine versus subcutaneous sumatriptan in acute migraine therapy in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jul;56(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.11.020. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
Miner JR, Fish SJ, Smith SW, Biros MH Droperidol vs. prochlorperazine for benign headaches in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Sep;8(9):873-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01147.x.
Myburgh JA Fluid resuscitation in acute medicine: what is the current situation? J Intern Med. 2015 Jan;277(1):58-68. doi: 10.1111/joim.12326. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
Patniyot IR, Gelfand AA Acute Treatment Therapies for Pediatric Migraine: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Headache. 2016 Jan;56(1):49-70. doi: 10.1111/head.12746.
Richer L, Craig W, Rowe B Randomized controlled trial of treatment expectation and intravenous fluid in pediatric migraine. Headache. 2014 Oct;54(9):1496-505. doi: 10.1111/head.12443. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
Tanen DA, Miller S, French T, Riffenburgh RH Intravenous sodium valproate versus prochlorperazine for the emergency department treatment of acute migraine headaches: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Jun;41(6):847-53. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.195.
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.
