Head Injury Trauma — Decompressive Craniectomy Following Trauma
Citation(s)
1 Wilson MH, Kolias AG, Hutchinson PJ. Neurotrauma - a multidisciplinary disease. Int J clic pract 2014;68:5-7. 2. Kolias AG, Kirkpatrick PJ, Hutchinson PJ. Decompressive craniectomy: past, present, and future. Nat Rev Neurol 2013;9:405-15. 3. Sahuquillo J, Arikan F. Decompressive craniecomty for the treatment of refractory high intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;CD003983. 4. Cushing G. I. subtemporal Decompressive Opertions for the intracranial Complications Associated with Bursting Fractures of the Skull. Ann Surg 1908;47:641-4.1 5. Polin RS, Shaffrey ME, Bogaev, et al. Decompressive bifrontal craniectomy in the treatment of severe refractory posttraumatic cerebral edema. Neurosugery 2015;41:84-92. 6. Whitfield PC, Patel H, Hutchinson PJ, et al. Bifrontal decompressive craniectomy in the management of posttraumatic intracranial hypertension. Br J Neurosurg 2014;15:500-7. 7. De luca GP, Volpin L, Fornezza U, Cervellini P, Zanusso M, Casentini L, Curri D, Piacentino M, Bozzato G, Colombo F, The role of decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of uncontroolable pos-traumatic intracranial hypertension. Acta Neurichir (Suppl) 2000;76:401-404. 8. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. & Buchner, A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 2014;39, 175-191.. 9. I. Timofeev, P.J.Kirkpatrick, E.Corteen, M.Hiller, M.Czosnyka, D.K.Menon, J.D.Pickard, and P.J.Hutchinson Decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury 2006;96:11-16 10. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. Lancet 1974; 81-84 11. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment and prognosis of coma after head injury. Acta Neurochir 1976; 34:45-55.
Effect of Decompressive Craniectomy Following Traumatic Brain Injury: One Year Study
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.
