Gynecologic Cancer — Prognostic Markers of Gynecologic Cancers
Citation(s)
Chen Y, Miller C, Mosher R, Zhao X, Deeds J, Morrissey M, Bryant B, Yang D, Meyer R, Cronin F, Gostout BS, Smith-McCune K, Schlegel R , "Identification of Cervical Cancer Markers by cDNA and Tissue Microarrays," Cancer Research, Vol. 63(8), p.1927 - 1935, April 2003. Nucci MR, Castrillon DH, Bai H, Quade BJ, Ince TA, Genest DR, Lee KR, Mutter GL, Crum CP, "Biomarkers in Diagnostic Obstetric and Gynecologic Pathology: a Review," Adv. Anat. Pathol.,Vol.10(2), p. 55-68, March 2003. Nicolette CA, Miller GA., "The Identification of Clinically Relevant Markers and Therapeutic Targets," Drug Discov. Today, Vol. 8(1), p. 31-38, Jan. 2003. Salvesen HB, Akslen LA., "Molecular Pathogenesis and Prognostic Factors in Endometrial Carcinoma," APMIS, Vol. 110(10), p. 673-689, Oct. 2002. Geisler JP, Geisler HE, "Tumor Markers and Molecular Biological Markers in Gynecologic Malignancies," Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol., Vol. 13(1), p. 31-39, Feb. 2001. Holschneider CH, Berek JS, "Ovarian Cancer: Epidemiology, Biology, and Prognostic Factors," Semin. Surg. Oncol., Vol. 19(1), p. 3-10, Jul-Aug 2000. Framarino dei Malatesta ML, Veneziano M, Peppicelli M, Lanzi G, Marzetti L, "Biologic Prognostic Factors in Ovarian Cancer: a Review," Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., Vol. 19(2), p. 123-125, 1998. Busmanis I, "Biomarkers in Carcinoma of the Cervix: Emphasis on Tissue-Related Factors and their Potential Prognostic Factors," Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore, Vol. 27(5), p. 671-675, Sep. 1998. Grizzle WE, "Biomarkers - The New Frontier in the Pathology of Invasive and Preinvasive Neoplasias," Biotech. Histochem., Vol. 72(2), p. 59-61, March 1997. Grizzle WE, Myers RB, Manne U, "The Use of Biomarker Expression to Characterize Neoplastic Processes," Biotech. Histochem., Vol. 72(2), p. 96-104, March 1997.
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.
