Alvarez Bustins G, López Plaza PV, Carvajal SR Profile of osteopathic practice in Spain: results from a standardized data collection study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018 Apr 11;18(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12906-018-2190-0.
Amodio DM The neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014 Oct;15(10):670-82. doi: 10.1038/nrn3800. Epub 2014 Sep 4. Review.
Balayla J Male physicians treating Female patients: Issues, Controversies and Gynecology. Mcgill J Med. 2011 Jun;13(1):72.
Barrett LF, Bliss-Moreau E She's emotional. He's having a bad day: attributional explanations for emotion stereotypes. Emotion. 2009 Oct;9(5):649-58. doi: 10.1037/a0016821.
Bishop FL, Massey Y, Yardley L, Lewith GT How patients choose acupuncturists: a mixed-methods project. J Altern Complement Med. 2011 Jan;17(1):19-25. doi: 10.1089/acm.2010.0061. Epub 2011 Jan 16.
Blanch-Hartigan D, Hall JA, Roter DL, Frankel RM Gender bias in patients' perceptions of patient-centered behaviors. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Sep;80(3):315-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.06.014. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
Burke SR, Myers R, Zhang AL A profile of osteopathic practice in Australia 2010-2011: a cross sectional survey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Aug 1;14:227. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-227.
Carey TS, Motyka TM, Garrett JM, Keller RB Do osteopathic physicians differ in patient interaction from allopathic physicians? An empirically derived approach. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2003 Jul;103(7):313-8.
Cerritelli F, Verzella M, Barlafante G Quality of life in patients referring to private osteopathic clinical practice: a prospective observational study. Complement Ther Med. 2014 Aug;22(4):625-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 May 24.
Chur-Hansen A Preferences for female and male nurses: the role of age, gender and previous experience --year 2000 compared with 1984. J Adv Nurs. 2002 Jan;37(2):192-8.
Cil TD, Easson AM The role of gender in patient preference for breast surgical care - a comment on equality. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2018 Jul 9;7(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13584-018-0231-2.
Consorti F, Mancuso R, Piccolo A, Consorti G, Zurlo J Evaluation of the acceptability of Peer Physical Examination (PPE) in medical and osteopathic students: a cross sectional survey. BMC Med Educ. 2013 Aug 22;13:111. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-111.
Hall JA, Roter DL Do patients talk differently to male and female physicians? A meta-analytic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2002 Dec;48(3):217-24.
Ino T, Nakai R, Azuma T, Kimura T, Fukuyama H Gender differences in brain activation during encoding and recognition of male and female faces. Brain Imaging Behav. 2010 Mar;4(1):55-67. doi: 10.1007/s11682-009-9085-0.
Janssen SM, Lagro-Janssen AL Physician's gender, communication style, patient preferences and patient satisfaction in gynecology and obstetrics: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Nov;89(2):221-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.034. Epub 2012 Jul 21. Review.
Johnson SM, Kurtz ME Osteopathic manipulative treatment techniques preferred by contemporary osteopathic physicians. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2003 May;103(5):219-24.
Kret ME, De Gelder B A review on sex differences in processing emotional signals. Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jun;50(7):1211-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.022. Epub 2012 Jan 8. Review.
LaFrance M, Hecht MA, Paluck EL The contingent smile: a meta-analysis of sex differences in smiling. Psychol Bull. 2003 Mar;129(2):305-34.
Lahat A, Assouline-Dayan Y, Katz LH, Fidder HH The preference for an endoscopist specific sex: a link between ethnic origin, religious belief, socioeconomic status, and procedure type. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013 Sep 9;7:897-903. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S48468. eCollection 2013.
McCall B What does the GDPR mean for the medical community? Lancet. 2018 Mar 31;391(10127):1249-1250. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30739-6.
Morin C, Aubin A Primary reasons for osteopathic consultation: a prospective survey in Quebec. PLoS One. 2014 Sep 3;9(9):e106259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106259. eCollection 2014. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0121180.
Nijs J, Roussel N, Paul van Wilgen C, Köke A, Smeets R Thinking beyond muscles and joints: therapists' and patients' attitudes and beliefs regarding chronic musculoskeletal pain are key to applying effective treatment. Man Ther. 2013 Apr;18(2):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.11.001. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
Olsson M, Martiny SE Does Exposure to Counterstereotypical Role Models Influence Girls' and Women's Gender Stereotypes and Career Choices? A Review of Social Psychological Research. Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 7;9:2264. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02264. eCollection 2018. Review.
Rásky É, Waxenegger A, Groth S, Stolz E, Schenouda M, Berzlanovich A Sex and gender matters : A sex-specific analysis of original articles published in the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift between 2013 and 2015. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2017 Nov;129(21-22):781-785. doi: 10.1007/s00508-017-1280-1. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
Rossettini G, Carlino E, Testa M Clinical relevance of contextual factors as triggers of placebo and nocebo effects in musculoskeletal pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jan 22;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-1943-8. Review.
Roter DL, Hall JA, Aoki Y Physician gender effects in medical communication: a meta-analytic review. JAMA. 2002 Aug 14;288(6):756-64.
Roter DL, Hall JA Physician gender and patient-centered communication: a critical review of empirical research. Annu Rev Public Health. 2004;25:497-519. Review.
Sandhu H, Adams A, Singleton L, Clark-Carter D, Kidd J The impact of gender dyads on doctor-patient communication: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Sep;76(3):348-55. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.010. Epub 2009 Aug 3. Review.
Shan G, Gerstenberger S Fisher's exact approach for post hoc analysis of a chi-squared test. PLoS One. 2017 Dec 20;12(12):e0188709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188709. eCollection 2017.
Sjöström O, Holst D Validity of a questionnaire survey: response patterns in different subgroups and the effect of social desirability. Acta Odontol Scand. 2002 Jun;60(3):136-40.
Stenberg G, Fjellman-Wiklund A, Ahlgren C "Getting confirmation": gender in expectations and experiences of healthcare for neck or back patients. J Rehabil Med. 2012 Feb;44(2):163-71. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0912.
Street RL Jr Gender differences in health care provider-patient communication: are they due to style, stereotypes, or accommodation? Patient Educ Couns. 2002 Dec;48(3):201-6. Review.
Testa M, Rossettini G Enhance placebo, avoid nocebo: How contextual factors affect physiotherapy outcomes. Man Ther. 2016 Aug;24:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 20. Review.
Tourangeau R, Yan T Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychol Bull. 2007 Sep;133(5):859-83. Review.
Wang MT, Degol JL Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions. Educ Psychol Rev. 2017 Mar;29(1):119-140. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
Does Gender Matter? Patient Preference in an Italian Osteopathic Clinical Setting
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.