Clinical trial NCT01463540 - References

Gastrostomy, Methods — Gastrostomy Tube Placed After Gastropexy Versus Gastrostomy Tube Placed Using the Traditional Push/Pull Techniques

Citation(s)

•   Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Tanaka N, Fujii H, Kajiyama M
  Prospective randomized trial comparing the direct method using a 24 Fr bumper-button-type device with the pull method for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Endoscopy. 2008 Sep;40(9):722-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1077490. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
•   Jain NK, Larson DE, Schroeder KW, Burton DD, Cannon KP, Thompson RL, DiMagno EP
  Antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Dec;107(6):824-8.
•   Maetani I, Tada T, Ukita T, Inoue H, Sakai Y, Yoshikawa M
  PEG with introducer or pull method: a prospective randomized comparison. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jun;57(7):837-41.
•   Shastri YM, Hoepffner N, Tessmer A, Ackermann H, Schroeder O, Stein J
  New introducer PEG gastropexy does not require prophylactic antibiotics: multicenter prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Apr;67(4):620-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.10.044.

A Multicentric, Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing Short and Long Time Outcome of Gastrostomy Tube Placed After Gastropexy, Versus Gastrostomy Tube Placed Using the Traditional Push/Pull Techniques

Details for clinical trial NCT01463540