Fracture Clavicle — Hook Plate vs Tightrope in Fixation of Fracture Distal Third Clavicle
Citation(s)
Flinkkilä T, Heikkilä A, Sirniö K, Pakarinen H TightRope versus clavicular hook plate fixation for unstable distal clavicular fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Apr;25(3):465-9. doi: 10.1007/s00590-014-1526-9. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
Haque S, Khan A, Sharma A, Sundararajan S Technical tip: tightrope fixation of neer type II distal clavicle fracture supported by a case series. Pol Orthop Traumatol. 2014 Mar 27;79:19-22.
Lee W, Choi CH, Choi YR, Lim KH, Chun YM Clavicle hook plate fixation for distal-third clavicle fracture (Neer type II): comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes between Neer types IIA and IIB. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Jul;26(7):1210-1215. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.11.046. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
Yan HW, Li L, Wang RC, Yang Y, Xie Y, Tang J, Shi ZY Clinical efficacies of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using suture anchor versus hook plate in the treatment of distal clavicle fracture. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Dec;103(8):1287-1293. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
Hook Plate vs Tightrope in Fixation of Fracture Distal Third Clavicle
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.
