Financial Stress — Counterfactual Strategies, Physical Activity, and Wearable Trackers
Citation(s)
Adler NE, Epel ES, Castellazzo G, Ickovics JR Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychol. 2000 Nov;19(6):586-92. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.19.6.586.
Attig, C , & Franke, T. (2019). I track, therefore I walk - Exploring the motivational costs of wearing activity trackers in actual users. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 127, 211-224.
Bantham A, Taverno Ross SE, Sebastiao E, Hall G Overcoming barriers to physical activity in underserved populations. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Jan-Feb;64:64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
Biener L, Abrams DB The Contemplation Ladder: validation of a measure of readiness to consider smoking cessation. Health Psychol. 1991;10(5):360-5. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.10.5.360.
Dyczewski, E A., & Markman, K. D. (2012).General attainability beliefs moderate the motivational effects of counterfactual thinking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1217-1220.
Epstude K, Roese NJ The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2008 May;12(2):168-92. doi: 10.1177/1088868308316091.
Fishbein, M , & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press.
Friedenreich CM, Ryder-Burbidge C, McNeil J Physical activity, obesity and sedentary behavior in cancer etiology: epidemiologic evidence and biologic mechanisms. Mol Oncol. 2021 Mar;15(3):790-800. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12772. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
Ozemek C, Lavie CJ, Rognmo O Global physical activity levels - Need for intervention. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Mar-Apr;62(2):102-107. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
Rodgers, W M., & Sullivan, M. J. L. (2001). Task, coping, and scheduling self-efficacy in relation to frequency of physical activity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(4), 741-753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb01411.x
Roese, N J. (1994). The functional basis of counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 805-818.
Roese, N J., & Epstude, K. (2017). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking: New evidence, new challenges, new insights. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 1-79.
Spellman, B A. & Mandel, D. R. (1999). When possibility informs reality: Counterfactual thinking as a cue to causality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 120-123.
Wilson DK, Kirtland KA, Ainsworth BE, Addy CL Socioeconomic status and perceptions of access and safety for physical activity. Ann Behav Med. 2004 Aug;28(1):20-8. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2801_4.
Zhang H, Rodriguez-Monguio R Racial disparities in the risk of developing obesity-related diseases: a cross-sectional study. Ethn Dis. 2012 Summer;22(3):308-16.
Using Counterfactual Strategies to Understand and Promote Physical Activity Behavior in Low-socioeconomic Status Individuals
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.
