Bandura A Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215.
Barton JR, Corbett S, van der Vleuten CP; English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme ; UK Joint Advisory Group for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.. The validity and reliability of a Direct Observation of Procedural Skills assessment tool: assessing colonoscopic skills of senior endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):591-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.053. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
Brydges R, Carnahan H, Rose D, Rose L, Dubrowski A Coordinating progressive levels of simulation fidelity to maximize educational benefit. Acad Med. 2010 May;85(5):806-12. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d7aabd.
Cook TM, Woodall N, Harper J, Benger J; Fourth National Audit Project . Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: intensive care and emergency departments. Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):632-42. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer059. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
Dedy NJ, Bonrath EM, Ahmed N, Grantcharov TP Structured Training to Improve Nontechnical Performance of Junior Surgical Residents in the Operating Room: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2016 Jan;263(1):43-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001186.
Dedy NJ, Szasz P, Louridas M, Bonrath EM, Husslein H, Grantcharov TP Objective structured assessment of nontechnical skills: Reliability of a global rating scale for the in-training assessment in the operating room. Surgery. 2015 Jun;157(6):1002-13. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.12.023. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
Gordon M, Darbyshire D, Baker P Non-technical skills training to enhance patient safety: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2012 Nov;46(11):1042-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04343.x. Review.
Guadagnoli M, Morin MP, Dubrowski A The application of the challenge point framework in medical education. Med Educ. 2012 May;46(5):447-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04210.x. Review.
Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behav. 2004 Jun;36(2):212-24.
Hales B, Terblanche M, Fowler R, Sibbald W Development of medical checklists for improved quality of patient care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Feb;20(1):22-30. Epub 2007 Dec 11. Review.
Hatala R, Cook DA, Zendejas B, Hamstra SJ, Brydges R Feedback for simulation-based procedural skills training: a meta-analysis and critical narrative synthesis. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014 May;19(2):251-72. doi: 10.1007/s10459-013-9462-8. Epub 2013 May 28. Review.
Hoch JS, Rockx MA, Krahn AD Using the net benefit regression framework to construct cost-effectiveness acceptability curves: an example using data from a trial of external loop recorders versus Holter monitoring for ambulatory monitoring of "community acquired" syncope. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jun 6;6:68.
Hull L, Arora S, Aggarwal R, Darzi A, Vincent C, Sevdalis N The impact of nontechnical skills on technical performance in surgery: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Feb;214(2):214-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.10.016. Epub 2011 Dec 24. Review.
Kemper PF, van Noord I, de Bruijne M, Knol DL, Wagner C, van Dyck C Development and reliability of the explicit professional oral communication observation tool to quantify the use of non-technical skills in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jul;22(7):586-95. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001451. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
Mann KV Theoretical perspectives in medical education: past experience and future possibilities. Med Educ. 2011 Jan;45(1):60-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03757.x.
Matharoo M, Haycock A, Sevdalis N, Thomas-Gibson S Endoscopic non-technical skills team training: the next step in quality assurance of endoscopy training. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 14;20(46):17507-15. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17507.
Matharoo M, Sevdalis N, Thillai M, Bouri S, Marjot T, Haycock A, Thomas-Gibson S The endoscopy safety checklist: A longitudinal study of factors affecting compliance in a tertiary referral centre within the United Kingdom. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015 Feb 11;4(1). pii: u206344.w2567. doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u206344.w2567. eCollection 2015.
Mishra A, Catchpole K, McCulloch P The Oxford NOTECHS System: reliability and validity of a tool for measuring teamwork behaviour in the operating theatre. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Apr;18(2):104-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.024760.
Walsh CM, Ling SC, Walters TD, Mamula P, Lightdale JR, Carnahan H Development of the gastrointestinal endoscopy competency assessment tool for pediatric colonoscopy (GiECAT KIDS). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014 Oct;59(4):480-6. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000358.
Walsh CM, Sherlock ME, Ling SC, Carnahan H Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD008237. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008237.pub2. Review.
Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S, Maran N Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: a review of the literature. Surgery. 2006 Feb;139(2):140-9. Review.
Impact of a Simulation-based Training Curriculum of Non-technical Skills on Colonoscopy Performance
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.