Clinical trial NCT03992300 - References

Edentulous Jaw — Comparison of Full-arch Implant-supported Frameworks From an Intraoral Scanning or From a Conventional Impression

Citation(s)

•   Abduo J, Bennani V, Waddell N, Lyons K, Swain M
  Assessing the fit of implant fixed prostheses: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 May-Jun;25(3):506-15. Review.
•   Ahlholm P, Sipilä K, Vallittu P, Jakonen M, Kotiranta U
  Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review. J Prosthodont. 2018 Jan;27(1):35-41. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12527. Epub 2016 Aug 2. Review.
•   Al-Meraikhi H, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy E, Brantley W, Johnston WM
  In vitro fit of CAD-CAM complete arch screw-retained titanium and zirconia implant prostheses fabricated on 4 implants. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Mar;119(3):409-416. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.023. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
•   al-Turki LE, Chai J, Lautenschlager EP, Hutten MC
  Changes in prosthetic screw stability because of misfit of implant-supported prostheses. Int J Prosthodont. 2002 Jan-Feb;15(1):38-42.
•   Alhashim A, Flinton RJ
  Dental gypsum verification jig to verify implant positions: a clinical report. J Oral Implantol. 2014 Aug;40(4):495-9. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00196.
•   Amin WM, Al-Ali MH, Al Tarawneh SK, Taha ST, Saleh MW, Ereifij N
  The effects of disinfectants on dimensional accuracy and surface quality of impression materials and gypsum casts. J Clin Med Res. 2009 Jun;1(2):81-9. doi: 10.4021/jocmr2009.04.1235. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
•   Assif D, Marshak B, Schmidt A
  Accuracy of implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996 Mar-Apr;11(2):216-22.
•   Chochlidakis KM, Papaspyridakos P, Geminiani A, Chen CJ, Feng IJ, Ercoli C
  Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Aug;116(2):184-190.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.017. Epub 2016 Mar 2. Review.
•   Corominas-Delgado C, Espona J, Lorente-Gascón M, Real-Voltas F, Roig M, Costa-Palau S
  Digital implant impressions by cone-beam computerized tomography: a pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Nov;27(11):1407-1413. doi: 10.1111/clr.12754. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
•   Ebadian B, Rismanchian M, Dastgheib B, Bajoghli F
  Effect of different impression materials and techniques on the dimensional accuracy of implant definitive casts. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015 Mar-Apr;12(2):136-43.
•   Ercoli C, Geminiani A, Feng C, Lee H
  The influence of verification jig on framework fit for nonsegmented fixed implant-supported complete denture. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 May;14 Suppl 1:e188-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00425.x. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
•   Gibbs SB, Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Ahuja S
  Comparison of polymerization shrinkage of pattern resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Aug;112(2):293-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Apr 14. Erratum in: J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Dec;114(6):872.
•   Holst S, Blatz MB, Bergler M, Goellner M, Wichmann M
  Influence of impression material and time on the 3-dimensional accuracy of implant impressions. Quintessence Int. 2007 Jan;38(1):67-73.
•   Jansen VK, Conrads G, Richter EJ
  Microbial leakage and marginal fit of the implant-abutment interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997 Jul-Aug;12(4):527-40. Erratum in: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997 Sep-Oct;12(5):709.
•   Jemt T, Rubenstein JE, Carlsson L, Lang BR
  Measuring fit at the implant prosthodontic interface. J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Mar;75(3):314-25.
•   Jemt T
  Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991 Fall;6(3):270-6.
•   Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR
  Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Jan;81(1):7-13. Review.
•   Katsoulis J, Takeichi T, Sol Gaviria A, Peter L, Katsoulis K
  Misfit of implant prostheses and its impact on clinical outcomes. Definition, assessment and a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10 Suppl 1:121-138. Review.
•   Klineberg IJ, Murray GM
  Design of superstructures for osseointegrated fixtures. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1985;28:63-9.
•   Lee H, So JS, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C
  The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Oct;100(4):285-91. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60208-5. Review.
•   Menini M, Setti P, Pera F, Pera P, Pesce P
  Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1253-1262. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2217-9. Epub 2017 Sep 30.
•   Millington ND, Leung T
  Inaccurate fit of implant superstructures. Part 1: Stresses generated on the superstructure relative to the size of fit discrepancy. Int J Prosthodont. 1995 Nov-Dec;8(6):511-6.
•   Papaspyridakos P, Lal K
  Computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing zirconia implant fixed complete prostheses: clinical results and technical complications up to 4 years of function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Jun;24(6):659-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02447.x. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
•   Peñarrocha-Diago M, Balaguer-Martí JC, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Balaguer-Martínez JF, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Agustín-Panadero R
  A combined digital and stereophotogrammetric technique for rehabilitation with immediate loading of complete-arch, implant-supported prostheses: A randomized controlled pilot clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Nov;118(5):596-603. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.015. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
•   Pradíes G, Ferreiroa A, Özcan M, Giménez B, Martínez-Rus F
  Using stereophotogrammetric technology for obtaining intraoral digital impressions of implants. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014 Apr;145(4):338-44. doi: 10.14219/jada.2013.45.
•   Rodriguez JM, Bartlett DW
  The dimensional stability of impression materials and its effect on in vitro tooth wear studies. Dent Mater. 2011 Mar;27(3):253-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.010. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
•   Sahin S, Cehreli MC
  The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: current status. Implant Dent. 2001;10(2):85-92. Review.
•   Schaefer O, Schmidt M, Goebel R, Kuepper H
  Qualitative and quantitative three-dimensional accuracy of a single tooth captured by elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Sep;108(3):165-72. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60141-3.
•   Tan MY, Yee SHX, Wong KM, Tan YH, Tan KBC
  Comparison of Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions: Effect of Interimplant Distance in an Edentulous Arch. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 March/April;34(2):366–380. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6855. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
•   Thongthammachat S, Moore BK, Barco MT 2nd, Hovijitra S, Brown DT, Andres CJ
  Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time. J Prosthodont. 2002 Jun;11(2):98-108.
•   Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Mörmann WH, Reich S
  Intraoral scanning systems - a current overview. Int J Comput Dent. 2015;18(2):101-29. English, German.

Comparison of Accuracy and Timing Parameter of Digital and Conventional Impression Techniques on Fully Edentulous Jaws: an in Vivo Study

Details for clinical trial NCT03992300