Clinical trial NCT04166890 - References

Drug Effect — Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Two Homologous Active Principles for Local Dental Anesthesia

Citation(s)

•   Aggarwal V, Singla M, Miglani S, Kohli S
  Efficacy of Articaine Versus Lidocaine Administered as Supplementary Intraligamentary Injection after a Failed Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block: A Randomized Double-blind Study. J Endod. 2019 Jan;45(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
•   Bartlett G, Mansoor J
  Articaine buccal infiltration vs lidocaine inferior dental block - a review of the literature. Br Dent J. 2016 Feb 12;220(3):117-20. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.93. Review.
•   Becker DE, Reed KL
  Essentials of local anesthetic pharmacology. Anesth Prog. 2006 Fall;53(3):98-108; quiz 109-10.
•   Castañeda DA, Briceño CR, Sánchez AE, Rodrí- guez A, Castro D, Barrientos S
  Prevalencia de dientes incluidos, retenidos e impactados analizados en radiografías panorámicas de población de Bogotá, Colombia. Univ Odontol. 2015 Jul-Dic; 34(73): 149-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.11144/ Javeriana.uo34-73.
•   Haas DA
  An update on local anesthetics in dentistry. J Can Dent Assoc. 2002 Oct;68(9):546-51. Review.
•   Haase A, Reader A, Nusstein J, Beck M, Drum M
  Comparing anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar after an inferior alveolar nerve block. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Sep;139(9):1228-35
•   Hersh EV, Giannakopoulos H, Levin LM, Secreto S, Moore PA, Peterson C, Hutcheson M, Bouhajib M, Mosenkis A, Townsend RR
  The pharmacokinetics and cardiovascular effects of high-dose articaine with 1:100,000 and 1:200,000 epinephrine. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006
•   Katyal V
  The efficacy and safety of articaine versus lignocaine in dental treatments: a meta-analysis. J Dent. 2010 Apr;38(4):307-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.12.003. Epub 2009 Dec 16. Review.
•   Kim C, Hwang KG, Park CJ
  Local anesthesia for mandibular third molar extraction. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Oct;18(5):287-294. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.5.287. Epub 2018 Oct 31. Review.
•   Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D
  Efficacy of articaine: a new amide local anesthetic. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000 May;131(5):635-42.
•   Meechan JG
  How to overcome failed local anaesthesia. Br Dent J. 1999 Jan 9;186(1):15-20. Review.
•   Mittal J, Kaur G, Mann HS, Narang S, Kamra M, Kapoor S, Sindhi M, Kataria R
  Comparative Study of the Efficacy of 4% Articaine vs 2% Lidocaine in Surgical Removal of Bilaterally Impacted Mandibular Third Molars. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Jun 1;19(6):743-748.
•   Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS)
  Marco Conceptual de la Clasificación Internacional para la Seguridad del Paciente. Ginebra: OMS; 2009.
•   Snoeck M
  Articaine: a review of its use for local and regional anesthesia. Local Reg Anesth. 2012;5:23-33. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S16682. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
•   St George G, Morgan A, Meechan J, Moles DR, Needleman I, Ng YL, Petrie A
  Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 10;7:CD006487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006487.pub2. Review.
•   Suresh K
  An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011 Jan;4(1):8-11. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.82352.
•   Vree TB, Gielen MJ
  Clinical pharmacology and the use of articaine for local and regional anaesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005 Jun;19(2):293-308. Review.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Two Homologous Active Principles for Local Dental Anesthesia: Non-inferiority Trial

Details for clinical trial NCT04166890