Fard AS, Esmaelzadeh M, Larijani B Assessment and treatment of diabetic foot ulcer. Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Nov;61(11):1931-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01534.x.
Murphy N Reducing infection in chronic leg ulcers with an activated carbon cloth dressing. Br J Nurs. 2016 Jun 23;25(12):S38-44. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.12.S38.
Probst S, Saini C, Skinner MB Comparison of sterile polyacrylate wound dressing with activated carbon cloth and a standard non-adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing with silver: a randomised controlled trial protocol. J Wound Care. 2019 Nov 2;28(11):722-728. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.11.722.
Scheer HS, Kaiser M, Zingg U Results of directly applied activated carbon cloth in chronic wounds: a preliminary study. J Wound Care. 2017 Aug 2;26(8):476-481. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.8.476.
Shahbazian H, Yazdanpanah L, Latifi SM Risk assessment of patients with diabetes for foot ulcers according to risk classification consensus of International Working Group on Diabetic Foot (IWGDF). Pak J Med Sci. 2013 May;29(3):730-4. doi: 10.12669/pjms.293.3473.
Snyder RJ, Hanft JR Diabetic foot ulcers--effects on QOL, costs, and mortality and the role of standard wound care and advanced-care therapies. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2009 Nov 1;55(11):28-38.
Vileikyte L Diabetic foot ulcers: a quality of life issue. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2001 Jul-Aug;17(4):246-9. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.216.
Comparing Activated Carbon Cloth Dressing and Silver-Based Dressing in a Diabetic Foot Ulcer Population
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.