Clinical Trials Logo

Citation(s)

  •   Akalin ZF, Ozkan YK, Ekerim A
    Effects of implant angulation, impression material, and variation in arch curvature width on implant transfer model accuracy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Jan-Feb;28(1):149-57. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2070.
  •   Al Quran FA, Rashdan BA, Zomar AA, Weiner S
    Passive fit and accuracy of three dental implant impression techniques. Quintessence Int. 2012 Feb;43(2):119-25.
  •   Alikhasi M, Siadat H, Nasirpour A, Hasanzade M
    Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Impression versus Conventional Method: Effect of Implant Angulation and Connection Type. Int J Dent. 2018 Jun 4;2018:3761750. doi: 10.1155/2018/3761750. eCollection 2018.
  •   Lee H, So JS, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C
    The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Oct;100(4):285-91. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60208-5.
  •   Lee SJ, Gallucci GO
    Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Jan;24(1):111-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02430.x. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
  •   Papaspyridakos P, Hirayama H, Chen CJ, Ho CH, Chronopoulos V, Weber HP
    Full-arch implant fixed prostheses: a comparative study on the effect of connection type and impression technique on accuracy of fit. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Sep;27(9):1099-105. doi: 10.1111/clr.12695. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
  •   Sorrentino R, Gherlone EF, Calesini G, Zarone F
    Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 May;12 Suppl 1:e63-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00167.x. Epub 2009 May 8.
  •   Vigolo P, Millstein PL
    Evaluation of master cast techniques for multiple abutment implant prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8(4):439-46.

Accuracy Evaluation of Full-arch Implant Impressions Using Different Workflows: A Prospective Study

Details for clinical trial NCT06393582