Clinical Trials Logo

Citation(s)

  •   Bhati B, Kukreja P, Kumar S, Rathi VC, Singh K, Bansal S
    Piezosurgery versus Rotatory Osteotomy in Mandibular Impacted Third Molar Extraction. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jan-Jun;7(1):5-10. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_38_16.
  •   Chang HH, Lee MS, Hsu YC, Tsai SJ, Lin CP
    Comparison of clinical parameters and environmental noise levels between regular surgery and piezosurgery for extraction of impacted third molars. J Formos Med Assoc. 2015 Oct;114(10):929-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
  •   Malden N
    Surgical forceps techniques. Dent Update. 2001 Jan-Feb;28(1):41-4.
  •   Sharma SD, Vidya B, Alexander M, Deshmukh S
    Periotome as an Aid to Atraumatic Extraction: A Comparative Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015 Sep;14(3):611-5. doi: 10.1007/s12663-014-0723-8. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
  •   Srivastava P, Shetty P, Shetty S
    Comparison of Surgical Outcome after Impacted Third Molar Surgery Using Piezotome and a Conventional Rotary Handpiece. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Sep;9(Suppl 2):S318-S324. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_354_18.

Periotome Versus Peizotome as an Aid of Atraumatic Extraction.

Details for clinical trial NCT04915443