Clinical trial NCT03837275 - References

Dental Implant — Hydrodynamic Ultrasonic Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation Technique Versus Closed Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation.

Citation(s)

•   Barone A, Santini S, Sbordone L, Crespi R, Covani U
  A clinical study of the outcomes and complications associated with maxillary sinus augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Jan-Feb;21(1):81-5.
•   Chipaila N, Marini R, Sfasciotti GL, Cielo A, Bonanome L, Monaco A
  Graftless sinus augmentation technique with contextual placement of implants: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2014 Dec 17;8:437. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-8-437.
•   Llopet J, Montaudon M, Guillaud E, Ella B
  Comparison of 2 crestal sinus floor lift techniques performed on human cadavers. Implant Dent. 2014 Oct;23(5):626-32. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000143.
•   Velázquez-Cayón R, Romero-Ruiz MM, Torres-Lagares D, Pérez-Dorao B, Wainwright M, Abalos-Labruzzi C, Gutiérrez-Pérez JL
  Hydrodynamic ultrasonic maxillary sinus lift: review of a new technique and presentation of a clinical case. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Mar 1;17(2):e271-5. Review.
•   Vercellotti T, Nevins ML, Kim DM, Nevins M, Wada K, Schenk RK, Fiorellini JP
  Osseous response following resective therapy with piezosurgery. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005 Dec;25(6):543-9.

Comparative Study of Sinus Floor Elevation Between Hydrodynamic Ultrasonic Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation Technique (Intralift Technique) Versus Closed Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation.

Details for clinical trial NCT03837275