Clinical trial NCT01268605 - References

Dental Caries — Postoperative Hypersensitivity Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Research Trial

Citation(s)

•   Akpata ES, Behbehani J
  Effect of bonding systems on post-operative sensitivity from posterior composites. Am J Dent. 2006 Jun;19(3):151-4.
•   Akpata ES, Sadiq W
  Post-operative sensitivity in glass-ionomer versus adhesive resin-lined posterior composites. Am J Dent. 2001 Feb;14(1):34-8.
•   American Academy of Sleep Medicine (2001)
  The international classification of sleep disorders, revised: diagnosis and coding manual. Westchester, IL: American Academy of Sleep Medicine.
•   Auschill TM, Koch CA, Wolkewitz M, Hellwig E, Arweiler NB
  Occurrence and causing stimuli of postoperative sensitivity in composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2009 Jan-Feb;34(1):3-10. doi: 10.2341/08-7.
•   Baratieri LN, Ritter AV
  Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2001;13(1):50-7.
•   Briso AL, Mestrener SR, Delício G, Sundfeld RH, Bedran-Russo AK, de Alexandre RS, Ambrosano GM
  Clinical assessment of postoperative sensitivity in posterior composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2007 Sep-Oct;32(5):421-6.
•   Browning WD, Blalock JS, Callan RS, Brackett WW, Schull GF, Davenport MB, Brackett MG
  Postoperative sensitivity: a comparison of two bonding agents. Oper Dent. 2007 Mar-Apr;32(2):112-7.
•   Casselli DS, Martins LR
  Postoperative sensitivity in Class I composite resin restorations in vivo. J Adhes Dent. 2006 Feb;8(1):53-8.
•   Cho BH, Dickens SH, Bae JH, Chang CG, Son HH, Um CM
  Effect of interfacial bond quality on the direction of polymerization shrinkage flow in resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2002 May-Jun;27(3):297-304.
•   Christensen GJ
  Preventing postoperative tooth sensitivity in class I, II and V restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002 Feb;133(2):229-31.
•   Efes BG, Dörter C, Gömeç Y, Koray F
  Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer and nanofill composite with and without a flowable liner. J Adhes Dent. 2006 Apr;8(2):119-26.
•   Ernst CP, Brandenbusch M, Meyer G, Canbek K, Gottschalk F, Willershausen B
  Two-year clinical performance of a nanofiller vs a fine-particle hybrid resin composite. Clin Oral Investig. 2006 Jun;10(2):119-25. Epub 2006 Mar 23.
•   Ernst CP, Martin M, Stuff S, Willershausen B
  Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for posterior teeth after 3 years. Clin Oral Investig. 2001 Sep;5(3):148-55.
•   Gordan VV, Mjör IA
  Short- and long-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity of a new resin-based restorative material and self-etching primer. Oper Dent. 2002 Nov-Dec;27(6):543-8.
•   Hayashi M, Wilson NH
  Failure risk of posterior composites with post-operative sensitivity. Oper Dent. 2003 Nov-Dec;28(6):681-8.
•   Johansson A, Haraldson T, Omar R, Kiliaridis S, Carlsson GE
  A system for assessing the severity and progression of occlusal tooth wear. J Oral Rehabil. 1993 Mar;20(2):125-31.
•   Kaurani M, Bhagwat SV
  Clinical evaluation of postoperative sensitivity in composite resin restorations using various liners. N Y State Dent J. 2007 Mar;73(2):23-9.
•   Lavigne GJ, Manzini C, Kato T (2005)
  Sleep Bruxism. In: Principles and practice of sleep medicine. MH Kryger, T Roth and WC Dement editors. Philadelphia: Elsevier, pp. 946-59
•   Letzel H
  Survival rates and reasons for failure of posterior composite restorations in multicentre clinical trial. J Dent. 1989;17 Suppl 1:S10-7; discussion S26-8.
•   Liang K-Y, Zeger SL (1986)
  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73:13-22.
•   Lundin SA, Rasmusson CG
  Clinical evaluation of a resin composite and bonding agent in Class I and II restorations: 2-year results. Quintessence Int. 2004 Oct;35(9):758-62.
•   Miguez PA, Pereira PN, Foxton RM, Walter R, Nunes MF, Swift EJ Jr
  Effects of flowable resin on bond strength and gap formation in Class I restorations. Dent Mater. 2004 Nov;20(9):839-45.
•   Ommerborn MA, Schneider C, Giraki M, Schafer R, Singh P, Franz M, Raab WH
  In vivo evaluation of noncarious cervical lesions in sleep bruxism subjects. J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Aug;98(2):150-8.
•   Opdam NJ, Feilzer AJ, Roeters JJ, Smale I
  Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: in vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage. Am J Dent. 1998 Oct;11(5):229-34.
•   Perdigão J, Anauate-Netto C, Carmo AR, Hodges JS, Cordeiro HJ, Lewgoy HR, Dutra-Corrêa M, Castilhos N, Amore R
  The effect of adhesive and flowable composite on postoperative sensitivity: 2-week results. Quintessence Int. 2004 Nov-Dec;35(10):777-84.
•   Perdigão J, Dutra-Corrêa M, Anauate-Netto C, Castilhos N, Carmo AR, Lewgoy HR, Amore R, Cordeiro HJ
  Two-year clinical evaluation of self-etching adhesives in posterior restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2009 Apr;11(2):149-59.
•   Perdigão J, Dutra-Corrêa M, Castilhos N, Carmo AR, Anauate-Netto C, Cordeiro HJ, Amore R, Lewgoy HR
  One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations. Am J Dent. 2007 Apr;20(2):125-33.
•   Perdigão J, Geraldeli S, Hodges JS
  Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: effect on postoperative sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Dec;134(12):1621-9.
•   Rosin M, Steffen H, Konschake C, Greese U, Teichmann D, Hartmann A, Meyer G
  One-year evaluation of an Ormocer restorative-a multipractice clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2003 Mar;7(1):20-6. Epub 2003 Feb 4.
•   Sadeghi M, Lynch CD, Shahamat N
  Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations. J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Jul;37(7):532-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02073.x. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
•   Sobral MA, Garone-Netto N, Luz MA, Santos AP
  Prevention of postoperative tooth sensitivity: a preliminary clinical trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2005 Sep;32(9):661-8.
•   Swift EJ Jr, Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr
  36-month clinical evaluation of two adhesives and microhybrid resin composites in Class I restorations. Am J Dent. 2008 Jun;21(3):148-52.
•   Türkün LS, Türkün M, Ozata F
  Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for a period of 3 years. Quintessence Int. 2005 May;36(5):365-72.
•   van Dijken JW, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K
  A two-year clinical evaluation of a new calcium aluminate cement in Class II cavities. Acta Odontol Scand. 2003 Aug;61(4):235-40.
•   Wegehaupt F, Betke H, Solloch N, Musch U, Wiegand A, Attin T
  Influence of cavity lining and remaining dentin thickness on the occurrence of postoperative hypersensitivity of composite restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2009 Apr;11(2):137-41.
•   Wilson NH, Wilson MA, Smith GA
  A clinical trial of a new visible light-cured composite restorative-- initial findings and one-year results. Quintessence Int. 1985 Apr;16(4):281-90.
•   Yip KH, Poon BK, Chu FC, Poon EC, Kong FY, Smales RJ
  Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin-based composites for posterior restorations in permanent teeth: results at 12 months. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Dec;134(12):1581-9.

Resin Based Composite Occlusal Restoration Postoperative Hypersensitivity: Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Research Trial

Details for clinical trial NCT01268605