Clinical Trials Logo

Citation(s)

  •   Berenstein CK, Mens LH, Mulder JJ, Vanpoucke FJ
    Current steering and current focusing in cochlear implants: comparison of monopolar, tripolar, and virtual channel electrode configurations. Ear Hear. 2008 Apr;29(2):250-60. doi: 10.1097/aud.0b013e3181645336.
  •   Bierer JA, Litvak L
    Reducing Channel Interaction Through Cochlear Implant Programming May Improve Speech Perception: Current Focusing and Channel Deactivation. Trends Hear. 2016 Jun 17;20:2331216516653389. doi: 10.1177/2331216516653389.
  •   Boulet J, White M, Bruce IC
    Temporal Considerations for Stimulating Spiral Ganglion Neurons with Cochlear Implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2016 Feb;17(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s10162-015-0545-5.
  •   Carlyon RP, Deeks JM
    Combined neural and behavioural measures of temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Nov;138(5):2885-905. doi: 10.1121/1.4934275.
  •   Carlyon RP, Deeks JM
    Limitations on rate discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Sep;112(3 Pt 1):1009-25. doi: 10.1121/1.1496766.
  •   Chatterjee M, Galvin JJ 3rd, Fu QJ, Shannon RV
    Effects of stimulation mode, level and location on forward-masked excitation patterns in cochlear implant patients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2006 Mar;7(1):15-25. doi: 10.1007/s10162-005-0019-2. Epub 2005 Nov 4.
  •   Dingemanse JG, Frijns JH, Briaire JJ
    Psychophysical assessment of spatial spread of excitation in electrical hearing with single and dual electrode contact maskers. Ear Hear. 2006 Dec;27(6):645-57. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000246683.29611.1b.
  •   Eggermont JJ
    Peripheral auditory adaptation and fatigue: a model oriented review. Hear Res. 1985 Apr;18(1):57-71. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(85)90110-8.
  •   Galvin JJ 3rd, Fu QJ
    Effects of stimulation rate, mode and level on modulation detection by cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2005 Sep;6(3):269-79. doi: 10.1007/s10162-005-0007-6.
  •   Goldsworthy RL, Shannon RV
    Training improves cochlear implant rate discrimination on a psychophysical task. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Jan;135(1):334-41. doi: 10.1121/1.4835735.
  •   Green T, Faulkner A, Rosen S
    Variations in carrier pulse rate and the perception of amplitude modulation in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):221-30. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318230fff8.
  •   Javel E, Shepherd RK
    Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. III. Response initiation sites and temporal fine structure. Hear Res. 2000 Feb;140(1-2):45-76. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00186-0.
  •   Kreft HA, Oxenham AJ, Nelson DA
    Modulation rate discrimination using half-wave rectified and sinusoidally amplitude modulated stimuli in cochlear-implant users. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Feb;127(2):656-9. doi: 10.1121/1.3282947.
  •   Kwon BJ, van den Honert C
    Effect of electrode configuration on psychophysical forward masking in cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 May;119(5 Pt 1):2994-3002. doi: 10.1121/1.2184128.
  •   Landsberger DM
    Effects of modulation wave shape on modulation frequency discrimination with electrical hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Aug;124(2):EL21-7. doi: 10.1121/1.2947624.
  •   Macherey O, Carlyon RP
    Re-examining the upper limit of temporal pitch. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Dec;136(6):3186. doi: 10.1121/1.4900917.
  •   McDermott HJ, McKay CM
    Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Mar;101(3):1622-31. doi: 10.1121/1.418177.
  •   McKay CM, McDermott HJ
    Loudness perception with pulsatile electrical stimulation: the effect of interpulse intervals. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Aug;104(2 Pt 1):1061-74. doi: 10.1121/1.423316.
  •   Miller CA, Woo J, Abbas PJ, Hu N, Robinson BK
    Neural masking by sub-threshold electric stimuli: animal and computer model results. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2011 Apr;12(2):219-32. doi: 10.1007/s10162-010-0249-9. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
  •   Moore BC
    Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones. J Acoust Soc Am. 1973 Sep;54(3):610-9. doi: 10.1121/1.1913640. No abstract available.
  •   Nelson DA, Kreft HA, Anderson ES, Donaldson GS
    Spatial tuning curves from apical, middle, and basal electrodes in cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jun;129(6):3916-33. doi: 10.1121/1.3583503.
  •   Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan JA
    Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Feb;95(2):1085-99. doi: 10.1121/1.408469.
  •   Pijl S, Schwarz DW
    Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Aug;98(2 Pt 1):886-95. doi: 10.1121/1.413514.
  •   Thornton AR, Raffin MJ
    Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. J Speech Hear Res. 1978 Sep;21(3):507-18. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2103.507.

Tradeoff Between Spatial Resolution of Neural Excitation and Temporal Rate Processing

Details for clinical trial NCT03867058