Clinical Trials Logo

Citation(s)

  •   Erel E, Pleasance PI, Ahmed O, Hart NB
    Absorbable versus non-absorbable suture in carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg Br. 2001 Apr;26(2):157-8.
  •   Joshi AS, Janjanin S, Tanna N, Geist C, Lindsey WH
    Does suture material and technique really matter? Lessons learned from 800 consecutive blepharoplasties. Laryngoscope. 2007 Jun;117(6):981-4. Erratum in: Laryngoscope. 2007 Aug;117(8):1510. Lindsey, Charlie [corrected to Lindsey, William H].
  •   Menovsky T, Bartels RH, van Lindert EL, Grotenhuis JA
    Skin closure in carpal tunnel surgery: a prospective comparative study between nylon, polyglactin 910 and stainless steel sutures. Hand Surg. 2004 Jul;9(1):35-8.
  •   Theopold C, Potter S, Dempsey M, O'Shaughnessy M
    A randomised controlled trial of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after open carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012 May;37(4):350-3. doi: 10.1177/1753193411422334. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
  •   Zemla J
    [Plastic operation of the alveolar process and associated deformities of the middle part of the face after primary operations for bilateral complete clefts of the lip, alveolar process and palate]. Protet Stomatol. 1977 Mar-Apr;27(2):143-4. Polish.

Use of 5-0 Prolene Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut During Cutaneous Wound Closure: a Randomized Evaluator Blinded Split Wound Comparative Effectiveness Trial

Details for clinical trial NCT03303014