Matsuba K, Ikeda T, Nagai A, Thurlbeck WM The National Institutes of Health Intermittent Positive-Pressure Breathing Trial: pathology studies. IV. The Destructive index. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 Jun;139(6):1439-45.
Nagai A, West WW, Paul JL, Thurlbeck WM The National Institutes of Health Intermittent Positive-Pressure Breathing trial: pathology studies. I. Interrelationship between morphologic lesions. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1985 Nov;132(5):937-45.
Nagai A, West WW, Thurlbeck WM The National Institutes of Health Intermittent Positive-Pressure Breathing trial: pathology studies. II. Correlation between morphologic findings, clinical findings, and evidence of expiratory air-flow obstruction. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1985 Nov;132(5):946-53.
Prigatano GP, Wright EC, Levin D Quality of life and its predictors in patients with mild hypoxemia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch Intern Med. 1984 Aug;144(8):1613-9.
West WW, Nagai A, Hodgkin JE, Thurlbeck WM The National Institutes of Health Intermittent Positive Pressure Breathing trial--pathology studies. III. The diagnosis of emphysema. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987 Jan;135(1):123-9.
Wilson DO, Rogers RM, Wright EC, Anthonisen NR Body weight in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The National Institutes of Health Intermittent Positive-Pressure Breathing Trial. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 Jun;139(6):1435-8.
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.
