Clinical trial NCT04582500 - References

Colorectal Cancer — Virtual Colonoscopy Using Omnipaque as a Contrast Agent

Citation(s)

•   American Cancer Society
  Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2014-2016. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2014
•   Bayer
  Bayer's product. Available via http://www.bayerresources.com.au/resources /uploads/PI/file9348.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2015.
•   Bielen D, Thomeer M, Vanbeckevoort D, Kiss G, Maes F, Marchal G, Rutgeerts P
  Dry preparation for virtual CT colonography with fecal tagging using water-soluble contrast medium: initial results. Eur Radiol. 2003 Mar;13(3):453-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-002-1755-x. Epub 2002 Nov 14.
•   Cai W, Yoshida H, Zalis ME, Nappi JJ, Harris GJ
  Informatics in radiology: Electronic cleansing for noncathartic CT colonography: a structure-analysis scheme. Radiographics. 2010 May;30(3):585-602. doi: 10.1148/rg.303095154. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
•   Callstrom MR, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, Reed JE, Ahlquist DA, Harmsen WS, Tait K, Wilson LA, Corcoran KE
  CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study. Radiology. 2001 Jun;219(3):693-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.219.3.r01jn22693.
•   Fletcher JG, Silva AC, Fidler JL, Cernigliaro JG, Manduca A, Limburg PJ, Wilson LA, Engelby TA, Spencer G, Harmsen WS, Mandrekar J, Johnson CD
  Noncathartic CT colonography: Image quality assessment and performance and in a screening cohort. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Oct;201(4):787-94. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9225.
•   Gryspeerdt S, Lefere P, Herman M, Deman R, Rutgeerts L, Ghillebert G, Baert F, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck B
  CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy. Eur Radiol. 2005 Jun;15(6):1192-202. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2644-x. Epub 2005 Feb 9.
•   Hong GS, Park SH, Kim B, Lee JH, Kim JC, Yu CS, Baek S, Lee JS, Kim HJ
  Simethicone to prevent colonic bubbles during CT colonography performed with polyethylene glycol lavage and iohexol tagging: a randomized clinical trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Apr;204(4):W429-38. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13024.
•   Horton KM, Fishman EK, Gayler B
  The use of iohexol as oral contrast for computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008 Mar-Apr;32(2):207-9. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3180674e44.
•   Iafrate F, Hassan C, Zullo A, Stagnitti A, Ferrari R, Spagnuolo A, Laghi A
  CT colonography with reduced bowel preparation after incomplete colonoscopy in the elderly. Eur Radiol. 2008 Jul;18(7):1385-95. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0892-2. Epub 2008 Mar 20.
•   Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, Mangiapane F, Lamazza A, Schillaci A, Sinibaldi G, Murakami T, Sammartino P, Hori M, Piacentini F, Nofroni I, Stipa V, Passariello R
  Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology. 2004 Nov;127(5):1300-11. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.08.025.
•   Kim B, Park SH, Hong GS, Lee JH, Lee JS, Kim HJ, Kim AY, Ha HK
  Iohexol versus diatrizoate for fecal/fluid tagging during CT colonography performed with cathartic preparation: comparison of examination quality. Eur Radiol. 2015 Jun;25(6):1561-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3568-0. Epub 2015 Jan 11.
•   Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Carbone I, Catalano C, Di Giulio E, Schillaci A, Passariello R
  Detection of colorectal lesions with virtual computed tomographic colonography. Am J Surg. 2002 Feb;183(2):124-31. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00857-1.
•   Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Carbone I, Catalano C, Panebianco V, Di Giulio E, Schillaci A, Passariello R
  Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): blinded prospective comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia. Endoscopy. 2002 Jun;34(6):441-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-31999.
•   Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Marrannes J, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck B
  CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Jun;184(6):1836-42. doi: 10.2214/ajr.184.6.01841836.
•   Lefere PA, Gryspeerdt SS, Dewyspelaere J, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck BG
  Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology. 2002 Aug;224(2):393-403. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2241011222.
•   Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, Smith RA, Brooks D, Andrews KS, Dash C, Giardiello FM, Glick S, Levin TR, Pickhardt P, Rex DK, Thorson A, Winawer SJ; American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group; US Multi-Society Task Force; American College of Radiology Colon Cancer Committee
  Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 May-Jun;58(3):130-60. doi: 10.3322/CA.2007.0018. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
•   Macari M, Bini EJ, Jacobs SL, Lui YW, Laks S, Milano A, Babb J
  Significance of missed polyps at CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Jul;183(1):127-34. doi: 10.2214/ajr.183.1.1830127.
•   Macari M, Bini EJ, Xue X, Milano A, Katz SS, Resnick D, Chandarana H, Krinsky G, Klingenbeck K, Marshall CH, Megibow AJ
  Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Radiology. 2002 Aug;224(2):383-92. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2242011382.
•   McNamara MM, Lockhart ME, Fineberg NS, Berland LL
  Oral contrast media for body CT: Comparison of diatrizoate sodium and iohexol for patient acceptance and bowel opacification. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Nov;195(5):1137-41. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3968.
•   Munikrishnan V, Gillams AR, Lees WR, Vaizey CJ, Boulos PB
  Prospective study comparing multislice CT colonography with colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal cancer and polyps. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Oct;46(10):1384-90. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6755-2.
•   Muto T, Bussey HJ, Morson BC
  The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer. 1975 Dec;36(6):2251-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.2820360944.
•   Nagata K, Singh AK, Sangwaiya MJ, Nappi J, Zalis ME, Cai W, Yoshida H
  Comparative evaluation of the fecal-tagging quality in CT colonography: barium vs. iodinated oral contrast agent. Acad Radiol. 2009 Nov;16(11):1393-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.05.003. Epub 2009 Jul 10.
•   Park SH, Yee J, Kim SH, Kim YH
  Fundamental elements for successful performance of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Korean J Radiol. 2007 Jul-Aug;8(4):264-75. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2007.8.4.264.
•   Peterson CM, Lin M, Pilgram T, Heiken JP
  Prospective randomized trial of iohexol 350 versus meglumine sodium diatrizoate as an oral contrast agent for abdominopelvic computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011 Mar-Apr;35(2):202-5. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182058e76.
•   Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, Butler JA, Puckett ML, Hildebrandt HA, Wong RK, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Schindler WR
  Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 4;349(23):2191-200. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031618. Epub 2003 Dec 1.
•   Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Kim DH, Reichelderfer M, Gopal DV, Pfau PR
  Screening for colorectal neoplasia with CT colonography: initial experience from the 1st year of coverage by third-party payers. Radiology. 2006 Nov;241(2):417-25. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2412052007. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
•   Pollentine A, Ngan-Soo E, McCoubrie P
  Acceptability of oral iodinated contrast media: a head-to-head comparison of four media. Br J Radiol. 2013 May;86(1025):20120636. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20120636.
•   Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A
  Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Jan-Feb;65(1):5-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
•   Smith RA, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Brooks D, Doroshenk M, Fedewa S, Saslow D, Brawley OW, Wender R
  Cancer screening in the United States, 2015: a review of current American cancer society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Jan-Feb;65(1):30-54. doi: 10.3322/caac.21261. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
•   Thomeer M, Bielen D, Vanbeckevoort D, Dymarkowski S, Gevers A, Rutgeerts P, Hiele M, Van Cutsem E, Marchal G
  Patient acceptance for CT colonography: what is the real issue? Eur Radiol. 2002 Jun;12(6):1410-5. doi: 10.1007/s003300101082. Epub 2002 Apr 24.
•   Thomeer M, Carbone I, Bosmans H, Kiss G, Bielen D, Vanbeckevoort D, Van Cutsem E, Rutgeerts P, Marchal G
  Stool tagging applied in thin-slice multidetector computed tomography colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003 Mar-Apr;27(2):132-9. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200303000-00005.
•   U
  S. Food and Drug Administration. Omnipaque (iohexol) injection. Available via http:// www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/018956s095,020608s031lbl.pdf. Accessed July 16, 2015
•   Zalis ME, Perumpillichira J, Del Frate C, Hahn PF
  CT colonography: digital subtraction bowel cleansing with mucosal reconstruction initial observations. Radiology. 2003 Mar;226(3):911-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2263012059. Epub 2003 Jan 24.
•   Zalis ME, Perumpillichira JJ, Magee C, Kohlberg G, Hahn PF
  Tagging-based, electronically cleansed CT colonography: evaluation of patient comfort and image readability. Radiology. 2006 Apr;239(1):149-59. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2383041308. Erratum In: Radiology. 2006 Jul;240(1):304.

Low-osmolar Contrast Tagging in Minimal Cathartic CT Colonography

Details for clinical trial NCT04582500