Colorectal Cancer — Increasing Colorectal and Breast Cancer Screening in Women
Citation(s)
Abrams DB, Mills S, Bulger D Challenges and future directions for tailored communication research. Ann Behav Med. 1999 Fall;21(4):299-306. Review.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Screening for breast cancer. Recommendations and rationale: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2002 February 2002 Contract No.: Document Number|.
American Cancer Society Cancer prevention & early detection facts & figures 2005. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2005 Contract No.: Document Number|.
American Cancer Society Report finds historic drop in total number of cancer deaths. 2006 [updated 2006; cited]; Available from: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/MED/content/MED_2_lx_American_Cancer_Society_Report_Finds_Drop _in_Total_Cancer_Deaths.asp
Andersen MR, Hager M, Su C, Urban N Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of mammography promotion by volunteers in rural communities. Health Educ Behav. 2002 Dec;29(6):755-70.
Andersen MR, Smith R, Meischke H, Bowen D, Urban N Breast cancer worry and mammography use by women with and without a family history in a population-based sample. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003 Apr;12(4):314-20.
Becker MH The Health Belief Model and personal health behavior. Becker MH, editor. San Francisco: Society for Public Health Education; 1974.
Beeker C, Kraft JM, Southwell BG, Jorgensen CM Colorectal cancer screening in older men and women: qualitative research findings and implications for intervention. J Community Health. 2000 Jun;25(3):263-78.
Briggs AH Handling uncertainty in economic evaluation and presenting the results. Drummond M, Maguire, A., editor. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
Brown ML, Potosky AL, Thompson GB, Kessler LG The knowledge and use of screening tests for colorectal and prostate cancer: data from the 1987 National Health Interview Survey. Prev Med. 1990 Sep;19(5):562-74.
Castro CM, King AC Telephone-assisted counseling for physical activity. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2002 Apr;30(2):64-8. Review.
CDRinfo com. Blu-ray penetration on Rise, Report Says2008 [cited 2008 October 20]: Available from: http://www.cdrinfo.com/sections/news/Details.aspx?NewsId=22933.
Champion V, Huster G Effect of interventions on stage of mammography adoption. J Behav Med. 1995 Apr;18(2):169-87.
Champion V, Skinner CS, Menon U Development of a self-efficacy scale for mammography. Res Nurs Health. 2005 Aug;28(4):329-36.
Champion V, Springston J, Hui S, Saywell RM, Jr , Zollinger TW, Ray D. Community intervention to increase mammography screening (funded research R01CA77736). Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 1998-2002 Contract No.: Document Number|.
Champion VL, Skinner CS, Foster JL The effects of standard care counseling or telephone/in-person counseling on beliefs, knowledge, and behavior related to mammography screening. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2000 Nov-Dec;27(10):1565-71.
Champion VL, Skinner CS Differences in perceptions of risk, benefits, and barriers by stage of mammography adoption. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2003 Apr;12(3):277-86.
Coleman EA, O'Sullivan P Racial differences in breast cancer screening among women from 65 to 74 years of age: trends from 1987-1993 and barriers to screening. J Women Aging. 2001;13(3):23-39.
Cooper GS, Koroukian SM Racial disparities in the use of and indications for colorectal procedures in Medicare beneficiaries. Cancer. 2004 Jan 15;100(2):418-24.
Dawson JD Stratification of summary statistic tests according to missing data patterns. Stat Med. 1994 Sep 30;13(18):1853-63.
Friedman LC, Webb JA, Richards CS, Plon SE Psychological and behavioral factors associated with colorectal cancer screening among Ashkenazim. Prev Med. 1999 Aug;29(2):119-25.
Glaser BG, Strauss AL The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Paperback ed. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter; 1967.
Gold MR, Gold SR, Weinstein MC Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Marthe R. Gold SRG, Milton C. Weinstein, editor. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996.
Gordon NP, Rundall TG, Parker L Type of health care coverage and the likelihood of being screened for cancer. Med Care. 1998 May;36(5):636-45.
Green PM, Kelly BA Colorectal cancer knowledge, perceptions, and behaviors in African Americans. Cancer Nurs. 2004 May-Jun;27(3):206-15; quiz 216-7.
Hall KL, Rossi JS Meta-analytic examination of the strong and weak principles across 48 health behaviors. Prev Med. 2008 Mar;46(3):266-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.11.006. Epub 2007 Nov 22. Review.
Hay JL, Buckley TR, Ostroff JS The role of cancer worry in cancer screening: a theoretical and empirical review of the literature. Psychooncology. 2005 Jul;14(7):517-34. Review.
Holt WS Jr Factors affecting compliance with screening sigmoidoscopy. J Fam Pract. 1991 Jun;32(6):585-9.
Jerant A, Kravitz RL, Rooney M, Amerson S, Kreuter M, Franks P Effects of a tailored interactive multimedia computer program on determinants of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled pilot study in physician offices. Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Apr;66(1):67-74. Epub 2006 Dec 6.
Luker KA, Box D The response of nurses towards the management and teaching of patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Int J Nurs Stud. 1986;23(1):51-9.
McCarthy BD, Moskowitz MA Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: patient attitudes and compliance. J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Mar;8(3):120-5.
Menon U Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in an average risk population [Dissertation]. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University; 2000.
Miller AB, Baines CJ, To T, Wall C Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years. CMAJ. 1992 Nov 15;147(10):1459-76. Erratum in: Can Med Assoc J 1993 Mar 1;148(5):718.
Miller AB, Baines CJ, To T, Wall C Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years. CMAJ. 1992 Nov 15;147(10):1477-88. Erratum in: Can Med Assoc J 1993 Mar 1;148(5):718.
Miller AB, Howe GR, Wall C The National Study of Breast Cancer Screening Protocol for a Canadian Randomized Controlled trial of screening for breast cancer in women. Clin Invest Med. 1981;4(3-4):227-58.
Morgan DL Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1997.
Nielsen Neilsen Media Report. 2008 [updated 2008; cited 2008 September 15]; Available from: htpp://www.nielsenmedia.com.
Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull. 2007 Jul;133(4):673-93.
Noar SM, Chabot M, Zimmerman RS Applying health behavior theory to multiple behavior change: considerations and approaches. Prev Med. 2008 Mar;46(3):275-80. Epub 2007 Aug 11.
Petty RE, Cacioppo JT Attitudes and persuasion--classic and contemporary approaches. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1996.
Pignone M, Harris R, Kinsinger L Videotape-based decision aid for colon cancer screening. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000 Nov 21;133(10):761-9.
Pignone M, Saha S, Hoerger T, Mandelblatt J Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jul 16;137(2):96-104. Review.
Polednak AP Knowledge of colorectal cancer and use of screening tests in persons 40-74 years of age. Prev Med. 1990 Mar;19(2):213-26.
Powe BD, Weinrich S An intervention to decrease cancer fatalism among rural elders. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1999 Apr;26(3):583-8.
Powe BD Promoting fecal occult blood testing in rural African American women. Cancer Pract. 2002 May-Jun;10(3):139-46.
Price JH, Colvin TL, Smith D Prostate cancer: perceptions of African-American males. J Natl Med Assoc. 1993 Dec;85(12):941-7.
Prochaska JJ, Sallis JF A randomized controlled trial of single versus multiple health behavior change: promoting physical activity and nutrition among adolescents. Health Psychol. 2004 May;23(3):314-8.
Prochaska JJ, Spring B, Nigg CR Multiple health behavior change research: an introduction and overview. Prev Med. 2008 Mar;46(3):181-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.001. Epub 2008 Feb 6. Review.
Prochaska JO, Velicer WF The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997 Sep-Oct;12(1):38-48. Review.
Rakowski W, Fulton JP, Feldman JP Women's decision making about mammography: a replication of the relationship between stages of adoption and decisional balance. Health Psychol. 1993 May;12(3):209-14.
Rimal RN, Flora JA Interactive technology attributes in health promotion: practical and theoretical issues. In: Street RL, Gold WR, Manning T, editors. Health Promotion and Interactive Technology: Theoretical Applications and Future Directions. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1997. p. 19- 38.
Shapiro JA, Seeff LC, Nadel MR Colorectal cancer-screening tests and associated health behaviors. Am J Prev Med. 2001 Aug;21(2):132-7.
Shapiro S Periodic screening for breast cancer: the HIP Randomized Controlled Trial. Health Insurance Plan. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997;(22):27-30.
Skinner CS, Champion VL, Menon U, Seshadri R Racial and educational differences in mammography-related perceptions among 1,336 nonadherent women. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology. 2002;20:1-18.
Skinner CS, Strecher VJ, Hospers H Physicians' recommendations for mammography: do tailored messages make a difference? Am J Public Health. 1994 Jan;84(1):43-9.
Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brawley OW Cancer screening in the United States, 2008: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and cancer screening issues. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 May-Jun;58(3):161-79. doi: 10.3322/CA.2007.0017. Epub 2008 Apr 28. Review.
Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006 Jan-Feb;56(1):11-25; quiz 49-50. Review.
Solomon D, Breen N, McNeel T Cervical cancer screening rates in the United States and the potential impact of implementation of screening guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Mar-Apr;57(2):105-11.
SPSS Statistical package for the social sciences, 15.0 for Windows. 15.0 for Windows ed. Chicago: SPSS, Inc.; 2006.
Tabár L, Faberberg G, Day NE, Holmberg L What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trial. Br J Cancer. 1987 May;55(5):547-51.
Tamm EP, Raval BK, Huynh PT Evaluation of the quality of self-education mammography material available for patients on the Internet. Acad Radiol. 2000 Mar;7(3):137-41.
Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33.
Westfall PH, Young SS Resampling-based multiple testing: examples and methods for P-value adjustment. New York: Wiley; 1993.
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.