NCT05125939 - Clinical Trial References

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Citation(s)

Kahi CJ, Vemulapalli KC, Johnson CS, Rex DK
Improving measurement of the adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy quality metric: the Indiana University experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):448-54. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.10.013. Epu
Kaltenbach T, Gawron A, Meyer CS, Gupta S, Shergill A, Dominitz JA, Soetikno RM, Nguyen-Vu T, A Whooley M, Kahi CJ
Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) Irrespective of Indication Is Comparable to Screening ADR: Implications for Quality Monitoring. Clin Gastroent
Ladabaum U, Shepard J, Mannalithara A
Adenoma and Serrated Lesion Detection by Colonoscopy Indication: The ADR-ESS (ADR Extended to all Screening/Surveillance) Score. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Sep;19(9):1873-1882. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.04.027. E
Rex DK, Ponugoti PL
Calculating the adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopies only: Is it necessary? Can it be gamed? Endoscopy. 2017 Nov;49(11):1069-1074. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-113445. Epub 2017 Jul 28.

Improving Colonoscopy Adenoma Detection Metrics by Extending the Screening-only Measurement to All Indications: a Prospective Multicenter Study

Clinical trial NCT05125939 - References