Clinical Trials Logo

Citation(s)

  •   Gonser M
    Re: Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;44(3):371. doi: 10.1002/uog.14631.
  •   Hoffmann J, Stumpp P, Exner M, Grothoff M, Stepan H
    Magnetic resonance imaging as additional diagnostic tool in assessment of lower uterine segment in women with previous Cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;53(2):270-272. doi: 10.1002/uog.19046.
  •   Jastrow N, Irion O, Roberge S, Bujold E
    Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;117(6):1438; author reply 1438-9. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821e24bc.
  •   Kumar I, Verma A, Matah M, Satpathy G
    Utility of multiparametric MRI in Caesarean section scar characterization and preoperative prediction of scar dehiscence: a prospective study. Acta Radiol. 2017 Jul;58(7):890-896. doi: 10.1177/0284185116675659. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
  •   Pomorski M, Fuchs T, Zimmer M
    Prediction of uterine dehiscence using ultrasonographic parameters of cesarean section scar in the nonpregnant uterus: a prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Oct 29;14:365. doi: 10.1186/s12884-014-0365-3.
  •   Satpathy G, Kumar I, Matah M, Verma A
    Comparative accuracy of magnetic resonance morphometry and sonography in assessment of post-cesarean uterine scar. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2018 Apr-Jun;28(2):169-174. doi: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_325_17.
  •   Wong WSF, Fung WT
    Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Cesarean Scar Defect. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2018 Jul-Sep;7(3):104-107. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_23_18. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Uterine Cesarean Section Scar Niche

Details for clinical trial NCT03911622