Clinical Trials Logo

Citation(s)

  •   Cabraja M, Oezdemir S, Koeppen D, Kroppenstedt S
    Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone cages. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Sep 14;13:172. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-172.
  •   Chen Y, Wang X, Lu X, Yang L, Yang H, Yuan W, Chen D
    Comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the surgical treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective, randomized, control study with over 7-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2013 Jul;22(7):1539-46. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2772-y. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
  •   Hsu MR, Haleem MS, Hsu W
    3D Printing Applications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. Minim Invasive Surg. 2018 Apr 1;2018:4760769. doi: 10.1155/2018/4760769. eCollection 2018.
  •   Lee YS, Kim YB, Park SW
    Risk factors for postoperative subsidence of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: the significance of the preoperative cervical alignment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jul 15;39(16):1280-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000400.
  •   Li ZJ, Wang Y, Xu GJ, Tian P
    Is PEEK cage better than titanium cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery? A meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Sep 1;17(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1234-1.
  •   McGilvray KC, Easley J, Seim HB, Regan D, Berven SH, Hsu WK, Mroz TE, Puttlitz CM
    Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model. Spine J. 2018 Jul;18(7):1250-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
  •   Niu CC, Liao JC, Chen WJ, Chen LH
    Outcomes of interbody fusion cages used in 1 and 2-levels anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: titanium cages versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Jul;23(5):310-6. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181af3a84.
  •   Rao PJ, Pelletier MH, Walsh WR, Mobbs RJ
    Spine interbody implants: material selection and modification, functionalization and bioactivation of surfaces to improve osseointegration. Orthop Surg. 2014 May;6(2):81-9. doi: 10.1111/os.12098.
  •   Seaman S, Kerezoudis P, Bydon M, Torner JC, Hitchon PW
    Titanium vs. polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody fusion: Meta-analysis and review of the literature. J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Oct;44:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.062. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
  •   Wilcox B, Mobbs RJ, Wu AM, Phan K
    Systematic review of 3D printing in spinal surgery: the current state of play. J Spine Surg. 2017 Sep;3(3):433-443. doi: 10.21037/jss.2017.09.01.

A Prospective Clinical Pilot Study Of Fusion Rates Using Spira™-C Titanium 3-D Printed Interbody Device For Anterior Cervical Discectomy And Fusion

Details for clinical trial NCT03786432