Clinical trial NCT01482039 - References

Cervical Insufficiency — Patient Attitudes Toward Ultrasound Measurement of Cervical Length

Citation(s)

•   Adams MM, Elam-Evans LD, Wilson HG, Gilbertz DA
  Rates of and factors associated with recurrence of preterm delivery. JAMA. 2000 Mar 22-29;283(12):1591-6.
•   Esplin MS, O'Brien E, Fraser A, Kerber RA, Clark E, Simonsen SE, Holmgren C, Mineau GP, Varner MW
  Estimating recurrence of spontaneous preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Sep;112(3):516-23. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318184181a.
•   Fonseca EB, Celik E, Parra M, Singh M, Nicolaides KH; Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening Group
  Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 2;357(5):462-9.
•   Hassan SS, Romero R, Vidyadhari D, Fusey S, Baxter JK, Khandelwal M, Vijayaraghavan J, Trivedi Y, Soma-Pillay P, Sambarey P, Dayal A, Potapov V, O'Brien J, Astakhov V, Yuzko O, Kinzler W, Dattel B, Sehdev H, Mazheika L, Manchulenko D, Gervasi MT, Sullivan L, Conde-Agudelo A, Phillips JA, Creasy GW; PREGNANT Trial
  Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;38(1):18-31. doi: 10.1002/uog.9017. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
•   Hibbard JU, Tart M, Moawad AH
  Cervical length at 16-22 weeks' gestation and risk for preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Dec;96(6):972-8.
•   Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, Thom E, McNellis D, Copper RL, Johnson F, Roberts JM
  The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med. 1996 Feb 29;334(9):567-72.
•   Stone PR, Chan EH, McCowan LM, Taylor RS, Mitchell JM; SCOPE Consortium
  Transabdominal scanning of the cervix at the 20-week morphology scan: comparison with transvaginal cervical measurements in a healthy nulliparous population. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Dec;50(6):523-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01225.x. Epub 2010 Sep 16.

Patient Attitudes Regarding Abdominal Versus Transvaginal Ultrasonography for Assessment of the Cervical Length in Low Risk Patients: a Randomized Trial

Details for clinical trial NCT01482039