Clinical trial NCT05119270 - References

Cataract — Comparison of Phacoemulsification and Corneal Damage Between FLACS and Standard Phaco With Two Handpieces

Citation(s)

•   Al-Mohtaseb Z, He X, Yesilirmak N, Waren D, Donaldson KE
  Comparison of Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss Between Two Femtosecond Laser Platforms and Standard Phacoemulsification. J Refract Surg. 2017 Oct 1;33(10):708-712. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170731-01.
•   Bascaran L, Alberdi T, Martinez-Soroa I, Sarasqueta C, Mendicute J
  Differences in energy and corneal endothelium between femtosecond laser-assisted and conventional cataract surgeries: prospective, intraindividual, randomized controlled trial. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug 18;11(8):1308-1316. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.08.10. eCollection 2018.
•   Bille JF, editor
  High Resolution Imaging in Microscopy and Ophthalmology: New Frontiers in Biomedical Optics [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2019. No abstract available. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554051/
•   Chen X, Xiao W, Ye S, Chen W, Liu Y
  Efficacy and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification for cataract: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 13;5:13123. doi: 10.1038/srep13123.
•   Ho JW, Afshari NA
  Advances in cataract surgery: preserving the corneal endothelium. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan;26(1):22-7. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000121.
•   Jiraskova N, Stepanov A
  OUR EXPERIENCE WITH ACTIVE SENTRY AND CENTURION OZIL HANDPIECES. Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2021 Winter;77(1):18-21. doi: 10.31348/2021/1.
•   Kelman CD
  Phaco-emulsification and aspiration. A new technique of cataract removal. A preliminary report. Am J Ophthalmol. 1967 Jul;64(1):23-35. No abstract available.
•   Krarup T, Holm LM, la Cour M, Kjaerbo H
  Endothelial cell loss and refractive predictability in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with conventional cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov;92(7):617-22. doi: 10.1111/aos.12406. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
•   Liu Y, Zeng M, Liu X, Luo L, Yuan Z, Xia Y, Zeng Y
  Torsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification: randomized comparative clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Feb;33(2):287-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.10.044.
•   Nagy Z, Takacs A, Filkorn T, Sarayba M
  Initial clinical evaluation of an intraocular femtosecond laser in cataract surgery. J Refract Surg. 2009 Dec;25(12):1053-60. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20091117-04.
•   Saeedi OJ, Chang LY, Ong SR, Karim SA, Abraham DS, Rosenthal GL, Hammer A, Spagnolo BV, Betancourt AE
  Comparison of cumulative dispersed energy (CDE) in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and conventional phacoemulsification. Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug;39(8):1761-1766. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0996-x. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
•   Solomon KD, Lorente R, Fanney D, Cionni RJ
  Clinical study using a new phacoemulsification system with surgical intraocular pressure control. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Apr;42(4):542-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.01.037.
•   Ye Z, Li Z, He S
  A Meta-Analysis Comparing Postoperative Complications and Outcomes of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery versus Conventional Phacoemulsification for Cataract. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:3849152. doi: 10.1155/2017/3849152. Epub 2017 Apr 30.

Comparison of Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss and Cumulative Dissipated Energy Between Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery and Standard Phacoemulsification With the Active Sentry or OZil Handpiece

Details for clinical trial NCT05119270