Clinical trial NCT05503719 - References

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome — An Absorbable Suture Versus a Non-absorbable Suture in Carpal Tunnel Release, a Randomized Controlled Trial

Citation(s)

•   Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosen I
  Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA. 1999 Jul 14;282(2):153-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.2.153.
•   Boya H, Ozcan O, Ozteki N HH
  Long-term complications of open carpal tunnel release. Muscle Nerve. 2008 Nov;38(5):1443-1446. doi: 10.1002/mus.21068.
•   Dosani A, Khan SK, Gray S, Joseph S, Whittaker IA
  Clinical outcome and cost comparison of carpal tunnel wound closure with monocryl and ethilon: a prospective study. Hand Surg. 2013;18(2):189-92. doi: 10.1142/S0218810413500226.
•   Erel E, Pleasance PI, Ahmed O, Hart NB
  Absorbable versus non-absorbable suture in carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg Br. 2001 Apr;26(2):157-8. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.2000.0545.
•   Kharwadkar N, Naique S, Molitor PJ
  Prospective randomized trial comparing absorbable and non-absorbable sutures in open carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Br. 2005 Feb;30(1):92-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.10.009.
•   Kim PT, Lee HJ, Kim TG, Jeon IH
  Current approaches for carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Orthop Surg. 2014 Sep;6(3):253-7. doi: 10.4055/cios.2014.6.3.253. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
•   Kundra RK, Newman S, Saithna A, Lewis AC, Srinivasan S, Srinivasan K
  Absorbable or non-absorbable sutures? A prospective, randomised evaluation of aesthetic outcomes in patients undergoing elective day-case hand and wrist surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010 Nov;92(8):665-7. doi: 10.1308/003588410X12699663905113. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
•   Menovsky T, Bartels RH, van Lindert EL, Grotenhuis JA
  Skin closure in carpal tunnel surgery: a prospective comparative study between nylon, polyglactin 910 and stainless steel sutures. Hand Surg. 2004 Jul;9(1):35-8. doi: 10.1142/s0218810404002017.
•   Padua L, Coraci D, Erra C, Pazzaglia C, Paolasso I, Loreti C, Caliandro P, Hobson-Webb LD
  Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Neurol. 2016 Nov;15(12):1273-1284. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30231-9. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
•   Povlsen B, Tegnell I
  Incidence and natural history of touch allodynia after open carpal tunnel release. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1996 Sep;30(3):221-5. doi: 10.3109/02844319609062819.
•   Quinn JV, Wells GA
  An assessment of clinical wound evaluation scales. Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Jun;5(6):583-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02465.x.
•   Theopold C, Potter S, Dempsey M, O'Shaughnessy M
  A randomised controlled trial of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after open carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012 May;37(4):350-3. doi: 10.1177/1753193411422334. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
•   Van Spall HG, Toren A, Kiss A, Fowler RA
  Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals: a systematic sampling review. JAMA. 2007 Mar 21;297(11):1233-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.11.1233.
•   Wang L
  Guiding Treatment for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2018 Nov;29(4):751-760. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
•   Zhang D, Blazar P, Earp BE
  Rates of Complications and Secondary Surgeries of Mini-Open Carpal Tunnel Release. Hand (N Y). 2019 Jul;14(4):471-476. doi: 10.1177/1558944718765226. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
•   Zhang D, Earp BE, Blazar P
  Evaluation and Management of Unsuccessful Carpal Tunnel Release. J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Sep;44(9):779-786. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.05.018. Epub 2019 Jul 9.

Skin Closure With a Fast Absorbable Braided Suture Versus a Non-absorbable Monofilament Suture in Open Carpal Tunnel Release, a Randomized Controlled Trial

Details for clinical trial NCT05503719