Carpal Tunnel Syndrome — Comparison of Two Techniques for the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Citation(s)
Bai J, Kong L, Zhao H, Yu K, Zhang B, Zhang J, Tian D Carpal tunnel release with a new mini-incision approach versus a conventional approach, a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2018 Apr;52:105-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.033. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
Chen L, Duan X, Huang X, Lv J, Peng K, Xiang Z Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel decompression. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Apr;134(4):585-93. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1898-z. Epub 2014 Jan 12.
Dias JJ, Bhowal B, Wildin CJ, Thompson JR Carpal tunnel decompression. Is lengthening of the flexor retinaculum better than simple division? J Hand Surg Br. 2004 Jun;29(3):271-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.01.011.
Hu K, Zhang T, Xu W Intraindividual comparison between open and endoscopic release in bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Brain Behav. 2016 Feb 16;6(3):e00439. doi: 10.1002/brb3.439. eCollection 2016 Mar.
Kang HJ, Koh IH, Lee TJ, Choi YR Endoscopic carpal tunnel release is preferred over mini-open despite similar outcome: a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 May;471(5):1548-54. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2666-z. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
Karlsson MK, Lindau T, Hagberg L Ligament lengthening compared with simple division of the transverse carpal ligament in the open treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1997 Mar;31(1):65-9. doi: 10.3109/02844319709010507.
Ludlow KS, Merla JL, Cox JA, Hurst LN Pillar pain as a postoperative complication of carpal tunnel release: a review of the literature. J Hand Ther. 1997 Oct-Dec;10(4):277-82. doi: 10.1016/s0894-1130(97)80042-7.
Michelotti BM, Vakharia KT, Romanowsky D, Hauck RM A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Open and Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Within the Same Patient. Hand (N Y). 2020 May;15(3):322-326. doi: 10.1177/1558944718812129. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
Netscher D, Steadman AK, Thornby J, Cohen V Temporal changes in grip and pinch strength after open carpal tunnel release and the effect of ligament reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am. 1998 Jan;23(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80088-9.
Shin EK Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019 Dec;12(4):509-514. doi: 10.1007/s12178-019-09584-0.
Teng X, Xu J, Yuan H, He X, Chen H Comparison of Wrist Arthroscopy, Small Incision Surgery, and Conventional Surgery for the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Retrospective Study at a Single Center. Med Sci Monit. 2019 Jun 3;25:4122-4129. doi: 10.12659/MSM.912912.
Xu L, Huang F, Hou C Treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome by coronal Z-type lengthening of the transverse carpal ligament. J Pak Med Assoc. 2011 Nov;61(11):1068-71.
Zhang X, Li Y, Wen S, Zhu H, Shao X, Yu Y Carpal tunnel release with subneural reconstruction of the transverse carpal ligament compared with isolated open and endoscopic release. Bone Joint J. 2015 Feb;97-B(2):221-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34423.
Zuo D, Zhou Z, Wang H, Liao Y, Zheng L, Hua Y, Cai Z Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release for idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Jan 28;10:12. doi: 10.1186/s13018-014-0148-6.
Comparison of Two Techniques for the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.