Cardiac Arrest — The Benefit of Prophylactic Anticonvulsant in Post Cardiac Arrest Syndrome With Induced Mild Hypothermia
Citation(s)
1 Willis, C.D., et al., Cardiopulmonary resuscitation after traumatic cardiac arrest is not always futile. Injury, 2006. 37(5): p. 448-54. 2. Eisenberg, M.S., et al., Cardiac arrest and resuscitation: a tale of 29 cities. Ann Emerg Med, 1990. 19(2): p. 179-86. 3. Edgren, E., et al., Assessment of neurological prognosis in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. BRCT I Study Group. Lancet, 1994. 343(8905): p. 1055-9. 4. Nolan, J.P., et al., Post-cardiac arrest syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognostication.Resuscitation, 2008. 79(3): p. 350-79. 5. Neumar, R.W., et al., Post-cardiac arrest syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognostication. Circulation, 2008. 118(23): p. 2452-83. 6. Kuboyama, K., et al., Delay in cooling negates the beneficial effect of mild resuscitative cerebral hypothermia after cardiac arrest in dogs: a prospective, randomized study. Crit Care Med, 1993. 21(9): p. 1348-58. 7. Weinrauch, V., et al., Beneficial effect of mild hypothermia and detrimental effect of deep hypothermia after cardiac arrest in dogs. Stroke, 1992. 23(10): p. 1454-62. 8. Sterz, F., et al., Mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves outcome after prolonged cardiac arrest in dogs. Crit Care Med, 1991. 19(3): p. 379-89. 9. Leonov, Y., et al., Mild cerebral hypothermia during and after cardiac arrest improves neurologic outcome in dogs. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 1990. 10(1): p. 57-70. 10. Bernard, S.A., et al., Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med, 2002. 346(8): p. 557-63.
The Benefit of Prophylactic Anticonvulsant in Post Cardiac Arrest Syndrome With Induced Mild Hypothermia
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.
